Suresh Narayanan commented that China has a strange value-added tax (VAT) in that it does not zero-rate agricultural products. Therefore, results cannot be generalized. Substituting VAT for business taxes is not heard of. He pointed out that a 5 percent decline in retail sales tax (RST) coupled with a 5 percent increase in VAT will not result in the same amount of government revenue collected because VAT has exemptions and thus the RST has to change more to result in revenue neutrality. The RST has a single collection point only, whereas the VAT has multiple collection points. Li and Liu's model does not take care of this difference in feature. Furthermore, Narayanan asked whether this model applies when there are no labor market frictions. He suggested that the model be extended in...
Skip Nav Destination
June 01 2018
Summary of the General Discussion on “The Effect of an Introduction of Retail Sales Tax in China”
Online Issn: 1536-0083
Print Issn: 1535-3516
© 2018 by the Asian Economic Panel and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Asian Economic Papers (2018) 17 (2): 24.
- Share Icon Share
- Views Icon Views
- Search Site
Summary of the General Discussion on “The Effect of an Introduction of Retail Sales Tax in China”. Asian Economic Papers 2018; 17 (2): 24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/asep_a_00603
Download citation file: