That Congress shall have Power . . . to promote the Progress of Science and useful
Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right
to their respective Writings and Discoveries.
—U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 8
The case that this book makes for reforming US copyright law so that
it supports universal open access to research publications has five parts:
1. Scholarly publishing’s principal stakeholders (including the big pub-
lishers) are now in agreement that “open access” to research publications
will do more to promote scientific progress than the subscription journal
system of the print era.
2. This open access consensus is not well served by a Copyright Act that
encourages restricting, rather than opening, access to research, which
means that the law falls short of its original intent “to promote the Prog-
ress of Science.”
3. Rather than reform the act, stakeholders have pursued legal and extra-
legal work-arounds—with embargoes, final drafts, illegal copies, Creative
Commons (CC) licenses—that are failing to deliver universal open access
with all due speed and at a fair price.
4. So why not legislate statutory licensing (long used with music copy-
right) for research publications in which research’s institutional users and
funders are required to fairly compensate scholarly publishers for imme-
diate open access?
5. Such a legislative fix is not too much to request of a Congress that has
enacted nearly sixty digital-era reforms of the Copyright Act for every-
thing but science, with some reforms working internationally, which is
the goal of this initiative.