Certainty & Uncertainty in Reporting Fingerprint Evidence | Citedby Results | Daedalus | MIT Press

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

Certainty & Uncertainty in Reporting Fingerprint Evidence

Daedalus (2018) 147 (4): 119–134.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

The Critical Importance of Impartiality in examining forensic evidence and reporting forensic findings to the Judiciary in South Africa

Joe Smith
Juanida Horne
Mogambal Singh
Palesa Mashaba
Melicent Ramohlale

SSRN Electronic Journal (2024)

The shifting narrative of uncertainty: a case for the coherent and consistent consideration of uncertainty in forensic science

N. Georgiou
R.M. Morgan
J.C. French

Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences (2023) 55 (6): 781.

The scientific reinvention of forensic science

Jonathan J. Koehler
Jennifer L. Mnookin
Michael J. Saks

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) 120 (41)

Inconclusives and error rates in forensic science: a signal detection theory approach

Hal R Arkes
Jonathan J Koehler

Law, Probability and Risk (2022) 20 (3): 153.

Battling to a draw: Defense expert rebuttal can neutralize prosecution fingerprint evidence

Gregory Mitchell
Brandon L. Garrett

Applied Cognitive Psychology (2021) 35 (4): 976.

Interpol review of fingermarks and other body impressions 2016–2019

Andy Bécue
Heidi Eldridge
Christophe Champod

Forensic Science International: Synergy (2020) 2: 442.

Forensic Source Conclusions

Jonathan J. Koehler

Zeitschrift für Psychologie (2020) 228 (3): 149.

The impact of proficiency testing information and error aversions on the weight given to fingerprint evidence

Gregory Mitchell
Brandon L. Garrett

Behavioral Sciences & the Law (2019) 37 (2): 195.