This article focuses on financial ‘model risk’ supervision as a test case for a reflexive approach to the sociology of contemporary financial markets. Model risk is customarily defined as a statistically significant relation between the expectation of a trading loss by a firm and its strategic use of, somehow flawed, econometric models for asset pricing and market trading purposes. It made its first public appearance in the mid-1990s, as a component of a new generation of financial risk management systems for the financial derivatives industry. Since then it has been assimilated by the most sophisticated national and international financial regulatory bodies. A perfect illustration of the thesis of the progressive ‘embedding of the economy into economics’, the forensic practice of financial reliability trials (backtesting) faces a deep pragmatic dilemma: how to distinguish truly unpredictable error from negligent risk management behaviour in a wildly randomized social environment.

This content is only available as a PDF.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the use is non-commercial and the original work is properly cited. For a full description of the license, please visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.