This article seeks to address some of the criticisms of ‘mainstream’ research methodology developed by consciously feminist theorists and researchers. It is argued that whereas ‘variable oriented’ methods are appropriate for the study of sex differences, the empirical examination of the processes of gender structuring requires a contextualised, case-oriented, approach. These arguments are developed drawing upon debates relating to comparative case study analysis, which are paralleled with the emerging comparative ‘gender systems’ approach to the study of gender relations. Drawing upon the work of Ragin, a strategy of biographical matching is developed and illustrated via examples from a European cross-national study exploring the restructuring of employment and gender relations in Britain, France and Norway.

Methodology, Comparative Research, Europe, Gender, Case Studies
This content is only available as a PDF.
Copyright Taylor & Francis
2001
Taylor & Francis
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the use is non-commercial and the original work is properly cited. For a full description of the license, please visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.