Explaining the emergence of the European Union's Single Market Program requires making sense of how that institutional project came on to the political agenda. This article uses insights from historical and organizational institutional theories to supplement intergovernmentalist and neofunctionalist accounts of the Single Market Program. The European Union was facing a political crisis in the early 1980s caused by an inability of states to find a set of institutional arrangements that were in their collective interest. This crisis enabled the European Commission to act as an institutional entrepreneur in several ways. They produced the Single Market Program as a project, helped build a political coalition to support its basic tenets, and ultimately reorganized the preferences of state actors. The power of the cultural frame approach is that it helps explain how institutional reform and monetary union - projects that were rejected by the states in 1983 - came to be accepted over the decade of the 1980s.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 01 2001
INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURS AND CULTURAL FRAMES: The case of the European Union's Single Market Program
Neil Fligstein
Neil Fligstein
Department of Sociology, Uppsala University
Search for other works by this author on:
Neil Fligstein
Department of Sociology, Uppsala University
Online ISSN: 1469-8307
Print ISSN: 1461-6696
Copyright Taylor & Francis
2001
Taylor & Francis
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the use is non-commercial and the original work is properly cited. For a full description of the license, please visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.
European Societies (2001) 3 (3): 261–287.
Citation
Neil Fligstein; INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURS AND CULTURAL FRAMES: The case of the European Union's Single Market Program. European Societies 2001; 3 (3): 261–287. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616690120079332
Download citation file:
Advertisement
Cited By
Related Articles
Participating in Polycentric Climate Governance: The Partnership Choices of Latin American NGOs
Global Environmental Politics (August,2024)