This paper deals with the congruency between care payments and family culture in Flanders (Belgium). Our main point is that the idea of getting the informal care paid for by the care receiver is not supported by a large part of the population, notwithstanding the fact that the system itself enjoys broad support. Therefore we propose to make a distinction between the attitudes of the population towards any state measure that transfers money to the household on the one hand and the concrete practices between care receivers and their informal carers on the other hand. Moreover we propose to make a distinction between co-residents and inter-household care situations because the mode of solidarity is not quite the same in the two different situations.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 01 2003
Paying for informal care: a contradictio in terminis? Open Access
Thérèse Jacobs
Thérèse Jacobs
University of Antwerp
, Antwerp, Belgium
Search for other works by this author on:
Thérèse Jacobs
University of Antwerp
, Antwerp, Belgium
Online ISSN: 1469-8307
Print ISSN: 1461-6696
Copyright Taylor & Francis
2003
Taylor & Francis
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the use is non-commercial and the original work is properly cited. For a full description of the license, please visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.
European Societies (2003) 5 (4): 397–417.
Citation
Thérèse Jacobs; Paying for informal care: a contradictio in terminis?. European Societies 2003; 5 (4): 397–417. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461669032000127660
Download citation file:
Advertisement