ABSTRACT This paper takes its starting point in the public discourse, of politicians and academics, that suggests that Europe, specifically the European Union, is suffering from a ‘crisis of identity’. This is believed to stem from the recent enlargements, the pending ‘problem of Turkey’, and disarray over the European Constitution. This issue is addressed in two ways: first, through an exploration of the main current models and meanings of ‘Europe’, and second, applying an anthropological approach to identity, through examining the relationship between models and meanings of ‘Europe’ and local, regional, ethnic and national identities. In the first place, this suggests that there is not, and cannot be, agreement over the shape and meaning of ‘Europe’. There is, rather, rooted in histories, geographies, politics, and cultures, a range of different Europes, which only coincide imperfectly, at best. In the second place, Europe is always viewed from local, regional, ethnic and national points of view. Each approach converges on the same conclusion: there can never be a clear-cut, consensual unified model of Europe. This is a normal situation, not a crisis, and, if anything, is one of the strengths of the European Union project.