The representation of optimization problems and algorithms in terms of numerical features is a well-established tool for comparing optimization problem instances, for analyzing the behavior of optimization algorithms, and the quality of existing problem benchmarks, as well as for automated per-instance algorithm selection and configuration approaches. Extending purely problem-centered feature collections, our recently proposed DynamoRep features provide a simple and inexpensive representation of the algorithmproblem interaction during the optimization process. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of the predictive power of the DynamoRep features for the problem classification, algorithm selection, and algorithm classification tasks. In particular, the features are evaluated for the classification of problem instances into problem classes from the BBOB (Black Box Optimization Benchmarking) suite, selecting the best algorithm to solve a given problem from a portfolio of three algorithms (Differential Evolution, Evolutionary Strategy, and Particle Swarm Optimization), as well as distinguishing these algorithms based on their trajectories. We show that, despite being much cheaper to compute, they can yield results comparable to those using state-ofthe-art Exploratory Landscape Analysis features.

Modular algorithm frameworks not only allow for combinations never tested in manually selected algorithm portfolios, but they also provide a structured approach to assess which algorithmic ideas are crucial for the observed performance of algorithms. In this study, we propose a methodology for analyzing the impact of the different modules on the overall performance. We consider modular frameworks for two widely used families of derivative-free, black-box optimization algorithms, the covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (CMA-ES) and differential evolution (DE). More specifically, we use performance data of 324 modCMA-ES and 576 modDE algorithm variants (with each variant corresponding to a specific configuration of modules) obtained on the 24 BBOB problems for six different runtime budgets in two dimensions. Our analysis of these data reveals that the impact of individual modules on overall algorithm performance varies significantly. Notably, among the examined modules, the elitism module in CMA-ES and the linear population size reduction module in DE exhibit the most significant impact on performance. Furthermore, our exploratory data analysis of problem landscape data suggests that the most relevant landscape features remain consistent regardless of the configuration of individual modules, but the influence that these features have on regression accuracy varies. In addition, we apply classifiers that exploit feature importance with respect to the trained models for performance prediction and performance data, to predict the modular configurations of CMA-ES and DE algorithm variants. The results show that the predicted configurations do not exhibit a statistically significant difference in performance compared to the true configurations, with the percentage varying depending on the setup (from 49.1% to 95.5% for modCMA and 21.7% to 77.1% for DE).