Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
NARROW
Format
Journal
TocHeadingTitle
Date
Availability
1-2 of 2
Jon Barnett
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Journal Articles
This Must Be the Place: Underrepresentation of Identity and Meaning in Climate Change Decision-Making
UnavailablePublisher: Journals Gateway
Global Environmental Politics (2011) 11 (2): 1–25.
Published: 01 May 2011
Abstract
View articletitled, This Must Be the Place: Underrepresentation of Identity and Meaning in Climate Change Decision-Making
View
PDF
for article titled, This Must Be the Place: Underrepresentation of Identity and Meaning in Climate Change Decision-Making
The dangers that future climate change poses to physical, biological, and economic systems are accounted for in analyses of risk and increasingly figure in decision-making about responses to climate change. Yet the potential cultural and social impacts of climate change have scarcely been considered. In this article we bring the risks climate change poses to cultures and social systems into consideration through a focus on places—those local material and symbolic contexts that give meaning and value to peoples' lives. By way of examples, the article reviews evidence on the observed and projected impacts of climate change on the Arctic and Pacific island atoll nations. It shows that impacts may result in the loss of many unique natural and cultural components of these places. We then argue that the risk of irreversible loss of places needs to be factored into decision-making on climate change. The article then suggests ways forward in decision-making that recognizes these non-market and non-instrumental metrics of risk, based on principles of justice and recognition of individual and community identity.
Journal Articles
Publisher: Journals Gateway
Global Environmental Politics (2008) 8 (4): 1–8.
Published: 01 November 2008
Abstract
View articletitled, The Worst of Friends: OPEC and G-77 in the Climate Regime
View
PDF
for article titled, The Worst of Friends: OPEC and G-77 in the Climate Regime
In the climate change negotiations the thirteen countries that are members of OPEC obstruct progress towards reducing emissions of greenhouse gases. Although these actions undermine sustainable development in developing countries, the larger Group of 77 (G-77) coalition nevertheless tacitly supports its OPEC members in the climate regime. This article explains the connection between OPEC's interests in oil exports and its inaction on climate change, and the divergence of these interests with those of the G-77. It argues that OPEC's influence within the G-77, and therefore the climate regime, stems from the desire to maintain unity within the G-77. This unity has and is likely to continue to cost the majority of developing countries in the form delayed assistance for adaptation, the possibility of inadequate reduction in emissions under the second commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol, and continued dependence on increasingly expensive oil imports.