Optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) have emerged as a viable alternative to superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) to measure the magnetic fields generated by brain activity. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) systems based on OPMs offer potential advantages over conventional systems. However, there remains a pressing need for techniques and studies that demonstrate equivalence between emergent OPM-based instruments and the established conventional MEG standard. Here, we seek to demonstrate similarities between a 192-channel (64-triaxial sensor) OPM-based system and a 275-channel SQUID-based system, when measuring data during a sensory task designed elicit induced oscillatory (beta-band) and evoked responses as well as subtle attentional effects. We reasoned that in addition to measuring these primary responses (which are stable across individuals), neural fingerprinting (i.e., demonstrating that an individual’s OPM-MEG data can be identified from a group, by matching to their SQUID data) would determine whether subtle but repeatable differences between individuals are also measurable across OPM and SQUID-based platforms. Our results showed (1) that primary responses are measurable using both systems with correlations of 0.96 (beta responses) and 0.97 (evoked responses) at the group level; (2) both systems captured significant attentional modulation of the beta rhythm; and (3) fingerprinting was successful in 15 of 15 people using OPM-MEG, 14 of 15 people using SQUID-MEG, and 15 of 15 people when examining cross-platform data. Overall, our results confirm that the two MEG platforms capture similar information on brain function. This is an important step towards proving equivalence between OPMs and SQUIDs, which in turn is required if OPMs are to replace SQUIDs for clinical evaluations.

Optically-pumped magnetometers (OPMs) are compact and lightweight sensors that can measure magnetic fields generated by current flow in neuronal assemblies in the brain. Such sensors enable construction of magnetoencephalography (MEG) instrumentation, with significant advantages over conventional MEG devices, including adaptability to head size, enhanced movement tolerance, lower complexity, and improved data quality. However, realising the potential of OPMs depends on our ability to perform system calibration—which means finding sensor locations, orientations, and the relationship between the sensor output and magnetic field (termed sensor gain). Such calibration is complex in OPM-MEG since, for example, OPM placement can change from subject to subject (unlike in conventional MEG where sensor locations/orientations are fixed). Here, we present two methods for calibration, both based on generating well-characterised magnetic fields across a sensor array. Our first device (the HALO) is a head mounted system that generates dipole-like fields from a set of coils. Our second (the matrix coil (MC)) generates fields using coils embedded in the walls of a magnetically shielded room. Our results show that both methods offer an accurate means to calibrate an OPM array (e.g., sensor locations within 2 mm of the ground truth) and that the calibrations produced by the two methods agree strongly with each other: reconstructed positions, orientations, and gains differ on average by 2.0 mm; 1.2° and 1.3% between HALO and MC. When applied to data from human MEG experiments, both methods offer improved signal-to-noise ratio after beamforming, suggesting that they give calibration parameters closer to the ground truth than presumed physical sensor coordinates and orientations. Both techniques are practical and easy to integrate into real-world MEG applications. This advances the field significantly closer to the routine use of OPMs for MEG recording.