Artificial neural networks trained in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) have emerged as key tools to model brain processes, sparking the idea of aligning network representations with brain dynamics to enhance performance on AI tasks. While this concept has gained support in the visual domain, we investigate here the feasibility of creating auditory artificial neural models directly aligned with individual brain activity. This objective raises major computational challenges, as models have to be trained directly with brain data, which is typically collected at a much smaller scale than data used to train AI models. We aimed to answer two key questions: (1) Can brain alignment of auditory models lead to improved brain encoding for novel, previously unseen stimuli? (2) Can brain alignment lead to generalisable representations of auditory signals that are useful for solving a variety of complex auditory tasks? To answer these questions, we relied on two massive datasets: a deep phenotyping dataset from the Courtois neuronal modelling project, where six subjects watched four seasons (36 h) of the Friends TV series in functional magnetic resonance imaging and the HEAR benchmark, a large battery of downstream auditory tasks. We fine-tuned SoundNet, a small pretrained convolutional neural network with ~2.5 M parameters. Aligning SoundNet with brain data from three seasons of Friends led to substantial improvement in brain encoding in the fourth season, extending beyond auditory and visual cortices. We also observed consistent performance gains on the HEAR benchmark, particularly for tasks with limited training data, where brain-aligned models performed comparably with the best-performing models regardless of size. We finally compared individual and group models, finding that individual models often matched or outperformed group models in both brain encoding and downstream task performance, highlighting the data efficiency of fine-tuning with individual brain data. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of aligning artificial neural network representations with individual brain activity during auditory processing, and suggest that this alignment is particularly beneficial for tasks with limited training data. Future research is needed to establish whether larger models can achieve even better performance and whether the observed gains extend to other tasks, particularly in the context of few-shot learning.

Quantitative MRI (qMRI) promises better specificity, accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility relative to its clinically-used qualitative MRI counterpart. Longitudinal reproducibility is particularly important in qMRI. The goal is to reliably quantify tissue properties that may be assessed in longitudinal clinical studies throughout disease progression or during treatment. In this work, we present the initial data release of the quantitative MRI portion of the Courtois project on neural modelling (CNeuroMod), where the brain and cervical spinal cord of six participants were scanned at regular intervals over the course of several years. This first release includes 3 years of data collection and up to 10 sessions per participant using quantitative MRI imaging protocols (T 1 , magnetization transfer (MTR, MTsat), and diffusion). In the brain, T 1 MP2RAGE , fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), and radial diffusivity (RD) all exhibited high longitudinal reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient – ICC ≃ 1 and within-subject coefficient of variations – wCV < 1%). The spinal cord cross-sectional area (CSA) computed using T2w images and T 1 MTsat exhibited the best longitudinal reproducibility (ICC ≃ 1 and 0.7 respectively, and wCV 2.4% and 6.9%). Results from this work show the level of longitudinal reproducibility that can be expected from qMRI protocols in the brain and spinal cord in the absence of hardware and software upgrades, and could help in the design of future longitudinal clinical studies.