Scientists have long tried to predict evolutionary outcomes in order to design vaccines for next year’s diseases, stabilize endangered ecosystems, or make better choices in designing evolutionary algorithms. To predict, however, we must first be able to retroactively identify the key steps that determined the evolved state. Researchers have long examined the role of historical contingency in evolution; when do small, seemingly insignificant mutations substantially shift the probabilities of what traits or behaviors ultimately evolve? Practitioners of experimental evolution have recently begun to investigate this question using a new technique: analytic replay experiments. We can found many populations with a given genotype in order to measure the probability of a particular trait evolving from that starting point; we call this the “potentiation” of that genotype. Moving along a lineage, we can identify which mutations altered potentiation. Here we used digital organisms to conduct a high-resolution analysis of how individual mutations affected the potentiation of associative learning. We find that the probability of evolving associative learning can increase suddenly – even with a single mutation that appeared innocuous when it occurred. While there was no obvious signal to identify potentiating mutations as they arose, we were able to retrospectively identify mechanisms by which these mutations influenced subsequent evolution. Many of the most interesting and complex evolutionary adaptations that occur in nature are exceptionally rare. Here, we extend techniques for understanding these rare evolutionary events and the patterns and processes that produce them.

This content is only available as a PDF.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For a full description of the license, please visit