Debating American Engagement: The Future of U.S. Grand Strategy | Citedby Results | International Security | MIT Press

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

Debating American Engagement: The Future of U.S. Grand Strategy

International Security (2013) 38 (2): 181–199.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

The power transition and the US response to China’s expanded soft power

Wei-hao Huang
Donald Lien
Jun Xiang

International Relations of the Asia-Pacific (2020) 20 (3): 383.

Beyond balancing? Intrastate conflict and US grand strategy

Doug Stokes
Kit Waterman

Journal of Strategic Studies (2018) 41 (6): 824.

First Principles First: International Relations Theory and the Debate Over U.S. Grand Strategy

Paul C. Avey
Jonathan Markowitz
Robert J. Reardon

SSRN Electronic Journal (2017)

The Pivot before the Pivot: U.S. Strategy to Preserve the Power Balance in Asia

Nina Silove

International Security (2016) 40 (4): 45.

Contested Primacy in the Western Pacific: China's Rise and the Future of U.S. Power Projection

Evan Braden Montgomery

International Security (2014) 38 (4): 115.

Index to International Security: Volume 38 (Summer 2013–Spring 2014)

International Security (2014) 38 (4): 206.