How to Enlarge NATO: The Debate inside the Clinton Administration, 1993–95 | Citedby Results | International Security | MIT Press

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

How to Enlarge NATO: The Debate inside the Clinton Administration, 1993–95

International Security (2019) 44 (1): 7–41.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

Revisiting Insularity and Expansion: A Theory Note

John M. Schuessler
Joshua Shifrinson
David Blagden

Perspectives on Politics 1.

Evaluating NATO enlargement: scholarly debates, policy implications, and roads not taken

James Goldgeier
Joshua R. Itzkowitz Shifrinson

International Politics (2020) 57 (3): 291.

NATO as a political alliance: continuities and legacies in the enlargement debates of the 1990s

Susan Colbourn

International Politics (2020) 57 (3): 491.

NATO enlargement and US foreign policy: the origins, durability, and impact of an idea

Joshua R. Shifrinson

International Politics (2020) 57 (3): 342.

An uncertain journey to the promised land: The Baltic states’ road to NATO membership

Andres Kasekamp

Journal of Strategic Studies (2020) 43 (6-7): 869.

Land rush: American grand strategy, NATO enlargement, and European fragmentation

Paul van Hooft

International Politics (2020) 57 (3): 530.

‘Nothing but humiliation for Russia’: Moscow and NATO’s eastern enlargement, 1993-1995

Sergey Radchenko

Journal of Strategic Studies (2020) 43 (6-7): 769.

The overlooked importance of economics: why the Bush Administration wanted NATO enlargement

Liviu Horovitz
Elias Götz

Journal of Strategic Studies (2020) 43 (6-7): 847.

Patterns of continuity in NATO’s long history

Timothy Andrews Sayle

International Politics (2020) 57 (3): 322.