Abstract
Consilience refers to the quality of investigations that draw conclusions from forms of evidence that are epistemologically distinct. The term seems particularly apt for conclusions produced by natural-scientific investigations on the one hand and by historical and archaeological studies on the other. Consilience points to areas of underlying unity of humanistic and scientific investigation— a unity arising from that of reality itself; it represents a convergence in parallel but independent investigations that results in deductions that are much more robust than any investigation would be able to produce on its own.
Issue Section:
Review Essays
This content is only available as a PDF.
© 2011 by The Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Inc.
2011
You do not currently have access to this content.