Abstract
The Little Ice Age is not a dogma. It is an increasingly firm consensus backed by considerable evidence across a variety of sources. To disprove it, or even to call it into question, would mean finding systematic errors in several types of proxy data. Kelly and Ó Gráda have not cleared any of these hurdles, or even come close. The refutation of their arguments demonstrates just how strong the evidence for the Little Ice Age has become and just how important it is for historians to take it seriously.
Issue Section:
Comment and Commentary
This content is only available as a PDF.
© 2013 by The Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Inc.
2013
You do not currently have access to this content.