Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
NARROW
Format
Journal
TocHeadingTitle
Date
Availability
1-4 of 4
Hamish Scott
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Journal Articles
Publisher: Journals Gateway
The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (2014) 44 (4): 538–539.
Published: 01 February 2014
Journal Articles
Publisher: Journals Gateway
The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (2012) 43 (1): 90–92.
Published: 01 May 2012
Journal Articles
Publisher: Journals Gateway
The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (2011) 42 (2): 284–285.
Published: 01 September 2011
Journal Articles
Publisher: Journals Gateway
The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (2010) 41 (2): 227–242.
Published: 01 September 2010
Abstract
View article
PDF
Interpretations of England's Glorious Revolution of 1688–1689 fall into two categories. The first views the opposition to James II as a national movement—establishing English religious freedom and political liberty under the auspices of a parliamentary monarchy significantly different from the continental kingdoms in which absolutism held sway. The second posits an international conspiracy involving only a small minority of England's peerage and gentry and culminating in the invasion of William III, Dutch Stadtholder and eventual English king, who wanted to deploy British resources in the struggle against French power. Scholars have recently combined the two positions to form a composite interpretation. Pincus' 1688 , however, sets out to overthrow almost every piece of this established picture and to substitute the interpretation emblazoned in his subtitle; 1688 was nothing less than “The First Modern Revolution.”