One major problem in the empirical investigation of consciousness is to identify a so-called objective measure of the presence or absence of a specific conscious experience. An objective measure, in this context, refers to a measure of how well a subject is able to solve a task or to a report, given by the subject, which does not explicity refer to his or her own conscious experience. Such task performance or report may be influenced by conscious as well as unconscious processes. Subjective measures, on the other hand, are defined as reports (verbal or other kinds) made by a subject directly about his or her conscious experience. The paper by Busch, Fründ, and Herrmann (2009) is an important and interesting suggestion of how to find neural correlates involved in change detection and change blindness, but it also claims to infer knowledge about conscious experiences from its data. This...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2010
September 01 2010
Methodological Pitfalls in the “Objective” Approach to Consciousness: Comments on Busch et al. (2009) Unavailable
In Special Collection:
CogNet
Morten Overgaard,
Morten Overgaard
1Aarhus University Hospital, Hammel, Denmark
Search for other works by this author on:
Mads Jensen,
Mads Jensen
1Aarhus University Hospital, Hammel, Denmark
2University of Aarhus, Denmark
3Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Search for other works by this author on:
Kristian Sandberg
Kristian Sandberg
1Aarhus University Hospital, Hammel, Denmark
Search for other works by this author on:
Morten Overgaard
1Aarhus University Hospital, Hammel, Denmark
Mads Jensen
1Aarhus University Hospital, Hammel, Denmark
2University of Aarhus, Denmark
3Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Kristian Sandberg
1Aarhus University Hospital, Hammel, Denmark
Online ISSN: 1530-8898
Print ISSN: 0898-929X
© 2009 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2009
MIT Press
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (2010) 22 (9): 1901–1902.
Citation
Morten Overgaard, Mads Jensen, Kristian Sandberg; Methodological Pitfalls in the “Objective” Approach to Consciousness: Comments on Busch et al. (2009). J Cogn Neurosci 2010; 22 (9): 1901–1902. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21403
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionEmail alerts
Advertisement
Cited By
Related Articles
Objective and Subjective Measures of Change Blindness: Where Are the Real Pitfalls?
J Cogn Neurosci (September,2010)
White Matter Structure Changes as Adults Learn a Second Language
J Cogn Neurosci (August,2012)
Perception-action Dissociations as a Window into Consciousness
J Cogn Neurosci (July,2024)
Otto Neurath's Visual Politics: An Introduction to “Pictorial
Statistics Following the Vienna Method”
ARTMargins (February,2017)
Related Book Chapters
Methodological Problems and Pitfalls in the Study of Human Metacognition
Metacognition: Knowing about Knowing
Pitfall!
Racing the Beam: The Atari Video Computer System
Methodology in Cognition
The Nature of Cognition
Advances in Methodology
The Cognitive Neurosciences