Skip to Main Content

Advertisement

MIT Press Direct, home
header search
Search
Advanced Search
Skip Nav Destination

Capture by Context Elements, Not Attentional Suppression of Distractors, Explains the PD with Small Search Displays

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (2020) 32 (6): 1170–1183.
This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.
Inter-trial priming is not sufficient for feature-based distractor suppression
  • Aniruddha Ramgir
  • Dominique Lamy
Visual Cognition 1.
Separate Cue- and Alpha-Related Mechanisms for Distractor Suppression
  • Zach V. Redding
  • Ian C. Fiebelkorn
The Journal of Neuroscience (2024) 44 (25): e1444232024.
Relative saliency affects attentional capture and suppression of color and face singleton distractors: evidence from event-related potential studies
  • Yue Zhang
  • Hai Zhang
  • Shimin Fu
Cerebral Cortex (2024) 34 (4)
Search mode, not the attentional window, determines the magnitude of attentional capture
  • Dirk Kerzel
  • Stanislas Huynh Cong
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics (2024) 86 (2): 457.
Effects of spatial location on distractor interference
  • Dirk Kerzel
  • Martin Constant
Journal of Vision (2024) 24 (9): 4.
Repetition of critical search features modulates EEG lateralized potentials in visual search
  • Matt Oxner
  • Veronica Mazza
  • Matthias M Müller
Cerebral Cortex (2024) 34 (11)
On preventing capture: Does greater salience cause greater suppression?
  • Christopher Hauck
  • Eric Ruthruff
  • Mei-Ching Lien
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics (2023) 85 (8): 2553.
Does attentional suppression occur at the level of perception or decision-making? Evidence from Gaspelin et al.’s (2015) probe letter task
  • Dirk Kerzel
  • Olivier Renaud
Psychological Research (2023) 87 (4): 1243.
Attentional Suppression of Salient Distractors in Visual Search: Proactive or Reactive?
  • 悦 张
Advances in Psychology (2023) 13 (09): 3726.
Tuning to non-veridical features in attention and perceptual decision-making: An EEG study
  • Stefanie I. Becker
  • Zachary Hamblin-Frohman
  • Hongfeng Xia
  • Zeguo Qiu
Neuropsychologia (2023) 188: 108634.
Cognitive neuroscience perspective on memory: overview and summary
  • Sruthi Sridhar
  • Abdulrahman Khamaj
  • Manish Kumar Asthana
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (2023) 17
The Distractor Positivity Component and the Inhibition of Distracting Stimuli
  • Nicholas Gaspelin
  • Dominique Lamy
  • Howard E. Egeth
  • Heinrich R. Liesefeld
  • Dirk Kerzel
  • Ananya Mandal
  • Matthias M. Müller
  • Jeffrey D. Schall
  • Anna Schubö
  • Heleen A. Slagter
  • Brad T. Stilwell
  • Dirk van Moorselaar
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (2023) 35 (11): 1693.
Saliency affects attentional capture and suppression of abrupt‐onset and color singleton distractors: Evidence from event‐related potential studies
  • Xiaowen Chen
  • Bing Xu
  • Yanzhang Chen
  • Xianqing Zeng
  • Yue Zhang
  • Shimin Fu
Psychophysiology (2023) 60 (8)
Oculomotor suppression of abrupt onsets versus color singletons
  • Owen J. Adams
  • Eric Ruthruff
  • Nicholas Gaspelin
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics (2023) 85 (3): 613.
Attentional capture is modulated by stimulus saliency in visual search as evidenced by event-related potentials and alpha oscillations
  • Norman Forschack
  • Christopher Gundlach
  • Steven Hillyard
  • Matthias M. Müller
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics (2023) 85 (3): 685.
The Attentional Capture Debate: When Can We Avoid Salient Distractors and When Not?
  • Jan Theeuwes
Journal of Cognition (2023) 6 (1)
Inversion of pop-out for a distracting feature dimension in monkey visual cortex
  • P. Christiaan Klink
  • Rob R. M. Teeuwen
  • Jeannette A. M. Lorteije
  • Pieter R. Roelfsema
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) 120 (9)
The PD Reflects Selection of Nontarget Locations, Not Distractor Suppression
  • Dirk Kerzel
  • Stanislas Huynh Cong
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (2023) 35 (9): 1478.
Long‐term (statistically learnt) and short‐term (inter‐trial) distractor‐location effects arise at different pre‐ and post‐selective processing stages
  • Nan Qiu
  • Bei Zhang
  • Fredrik Allenmark
  • Jan Nasemann
  • Shao‐Yang Tsai
  • Hermann J. Müller
  • Zhuanghua Shi
Psychophysiology (2023) 60 (10)
Where to display vital information? ERP evidence for background changes
  • Greeshma Sharma
  • Joy Chatterjee
  • Sushil Chandra
Heliyon (2022) 8 (4): e09237.
An EEG study of the combined effects of top‐down and bottom‐up attentional selection under varying task difficulty
  • Einat Rashal
  • Mehdi Senoussi
  • Elisa Santandrea
  • Suliann Ben‐Hamed
  • Emiliano Macaluso
  • Leonardo Chelazzi
  • C. Nico Boehler
Psychophysiology (2022) 59 (6)
On preventing attention capture: Is singleton suppression actually singleton suppression?
  • Mei-Ching Lien
  • Eric Ruthruff
  • Christopher Hauck
Psychological Research (2022) 86 (6): 1958.
What the Flip? What the P-N Flip Can Tell Us about Proactive Suppression
  • Joyce Tam
  • Chloe Callahan-Flintoft
  • Brad Wyble
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (2022) 34 (11): 2100.
Electrophysiological evidence for target facilitation without distractor suppression in two-stimulus search displays
  • Norman Forschack
  • Christopher Gundlach
  • Steven Hillyard
  • Matthias M Müller
Cerebral Cortex (2022) 32 (17): 3816.
Dynamics of attentional allocation to targets and distractors during visual search
  • Norman Forschack
  • Christopher Gundlach
  • Steven Hillyard
  • Matthias M. Müller
NeuroImage (2022) 264: 119759.
Biased Competition between Targets and Distractors Reduces Attentional Suppression: Evidence from the Positivity Posterior Contralateral and Distractor Positivity
  • Dirk Kerzel
  • Stanislas Huynh Cong
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (2022) 34 (9): 1563.
Eye movements reveal the contributions of early and late processes of enhancement and suppression to the guidance of visual search
  • Zachary Hamblin-Frohman
  • Seah Chang
  • Howard Egeth
  • Stefanie I. Becker
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics (2022) 84 (6): 1913.
Statistical learning in visual search reflects distractor rarity, not only attentional suppression
  • Dirk Kerzel
  • Chiara Balbiani
  • Sarah Rosa
  • Stanislas Huynh Cong
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (2022) 29 (5): 1890.
Do we need attentional suppression?
  • Dirk Kerzel
  • Stanislas Huynh Cong
  • Nicolas Burra
Visual Cognition (2021) 29 (9): 580.
Attentional capture: An ameliorable side-effect of searching for salient targets
  • Heinrich R. Liesefeld
  • Anna M. Liesefeld
  • Hermann J. Müller
Visual Cognition (2021) 29 (9): 600.
Progress toward resolving the attentional capture debate
  • Steven J. Luck
  • Nicholas Gaspelin
  • Charles L. Folk
  • Roger W. Remington
  • Jan Theeuwes
Visual Cognition (2021) 29 (1): 1.
Preparatory Control Against Distraction Is Not Feature-Based
  • Heinrich R Liesefeld
  • Anna M Liesefeld
  • Hermann J Müller
Cerebral Cortex (2021)
Statistical regularities cause attentional suppression with target-matching distractors
  • Dirk Kerzel
  • Stanislas Huynh Cong
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics (2021) 83 (1): 270.
Standing out in a small crowd: The role of display size in attracting attention
  • Seah Chang
  • Ernst Niebur
  • Howard E. Egeth
Visual Cognition (2021) 29 (9): 587.
Attentional Templates Are Sharpened through Differential Signal Enhancement, Not Differential Allocation of Attention
  • Dirk Kerzel
  • Stanislas Huynh Cong
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (2021) 33 (4): 594.
Working memory content guides attention
  • Yu Luo
  • Jiarong Zhou
  • Wei Bao
  • Jing Qiu
  • Jingqing Nian
  • Yu Zhang
Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology (2021) 15
PD components and distractor inhibition in visual search: New evidence for the signal suppression hypothesis
  • Brandi Lee Drisdelle
  • Martin Eimer
Psychophysiology (2021) 58 (9)
How visual working memory handles distraction: cognitive mechanisms and electrophysiological correlates
  • Heinrich R. Liesefeld
  • Anna M. Liesefeld
  • Paul Sauseng
  • Simon N. Jacob
  • Hermann J. Müller
Visual Cognition (2020) 28 (5-8): 372.
Temporal attention boosts perceptual effects of spatial attention and feature-based attention
  • Verena C. Seibold
  • Madeleine Y. Stepper
  • Bettina Rolke
Brain and Cognition (2020) 142: 105570.

Advertisement

  • Online ISSN 1530-8898
  • Print ISSN 0898-929X
A product of The MIT Press
Newsletter sign up

MIT Press Direct

Information

MIT Press

Contact Us

© 2024 The MIT Press
Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. No content on this site may be used to train artificial intelligence systems without permission in writing from the MIT Press.
Accept