Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
NARROW
Format
Journal
TocHeadingTitle
Date
Availability
1-2 of 2
Andrew C. Papanicolaou
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Journal Articles
Publisher: Journals Gateway
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (2017) 29 (10): 1755–1765.
Published: 01 October 2017
FIGURES
| View All (4)
Abstract
View article
PDF
The results of this magnetoencephalography study challenge two long-standing assumptions regarding the brain mechanisms of language processing: First, that linguistic processing proper follows sensory feature processing effected by bilateral activation of the primary sensory cortices that lasts about 100 msec from stimulus onset. Second, that subsequent linguistic processing is effected by left hemisphere networks outside the primary sensory areas, including Broca's and Wernicke's association cortices. Here we present evidence that linguistic analysis begins almost synchronously with sensory, prelinguistic verbal input analysis and that the primary cortices are also engaged in these linguistic analyses and become, consequently, part of the left hemisphere language network during language tasks. These findings call for extensive revision of our conception of linguistic processing in the brain.
Journal Articles
Publisher: Journals Gateway
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (1990) 2 (1): 44–50.
Published: 01 January 1990
Abstract
View article
PDF
Utilizing the high spatial and temporal resolution of magnetoencephalography in conjunction with magnetic resonance images, the current study explored the underlying electrical patterns of cortical excitation during both contralateral and ipsilateral auditory stimulation. Instead of studying only the peaks of the N100 component of the evoked magnetic field, a 30-msec window was chosen about the area where the peaks occurred and the intracranial sources generating that component were estimated at successive 5-msec intervals. Results indicated that the sources for both contralateral and ipsilateral conditions were best represented as a continuous movement of activation in an anterior–inferior direction along the superior surface of the temporal lobe. Although the peak magnetic fields of the N100 to contralateral stimulation were of shorter latency and higher amplitude, the generating sources of both had very similar time-dependent movement patterns, and comparisons of source localizations were dependent on the latency at which they were contrasted.