The hippocampus is critical for encoding and retrieving semantic and episodic memories. Animal studies indicate that the hippocampus is also required for relational learning tasks. A prototypical relational learning task, and the one investigated in this experiment, using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging, is the transitive inference (TI) task. In the TI task, participants were to choose between A and B (A?B) and learned by trial and error to choose A (A > B). There were four such premise pairs during a training (A > B, B > C, C > D, D > E). These can be acquired distinctly or can be organized into a superordinate hierarchy (A > B > C > D > E), which would efficiently represent all the learned relations and allow inferences (e.g., B > D). At test there was no reinforcement: In addition to premise pairs, untrained pairings were introduced (e.g., A?E, B?D). Correctly inferring that B > D is taken as evidence for the formation of a superordinate hierarchy; several alternatives to the superordinate hierarchy hypothesis are considered. Awareness of the formation of this hierarchy was measured by a postscan questionnaire. Four main findings are reported: (1) Inferential performance and task awareness dissociated behaviorally and at the level of hemodynamic response; (2) As expected, performance on the inferred relation, B > D, corresponded to the ability to simultaneously acquire B > C and C > D premise pairs during training; (3) Interestingly, acquiring these “inner pairs” corresponded to greater hippocampal activation than the “outer pairs” (A > B, D > E) for all participants. However, a distinct pattern of hippocampal activity for these inner pairs differentiated those able to perform the inferential discrimination, B > D, at test. Because these inner premise pairs require contextual discrimination (e.g., C is incorrect in the context of B but correct in the context of D), we argue that the TI task is hippocampal-dependent because the premise pair acquisition necessary for inference is hippocampal-dependent; (4) We found B > D related hippocampal activity at test that is anatomically consistent with preconsolidation recall effects shown in other studies.

Studies in brain damaged patients conclude that the left hemisphere is dominant for controlling heterogeneous sequences performed by either hand, presumably due to the cognitive resources involved in planning complex sequential movements. To determine if this lateralized effect is due to asymmetries in primary sensorimotor or association cortex, whole-brain functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure differences in volume of activation while healthy right-handed subjects performed repetitive (simple) or heterogeneous (complex) finger sequences using the right or left hand. Advanced planning, as evidenced by reaction time to the first key press, was greater for the complex than simple sequences and for the left than right hand. In addition to the expected greater contralateral activation in the sensorimotor cortex (SMC), greater left hemisphere activation was observed for left, relative to right, hand movements in the ipsilateral left superior parietal area and for complex, relative to simple, sequences in the left premotor and parietal cortex, left thalamus, and bilateral cerebellum. No such volumetric asymmetries were observed in the SMC. Whereas the overall MR signal intensity was greater in the left than right SMC, the extent of this asymmetry did not vary with hand or complexity level. In contrast, signal intensity in the parietal and premotor cortex was greater in the left than right hemisphere and for the complex than simple sequences. Signal intensity in the caudal anterior cerebellum was greater bilaterally for the complex than simple sequences. These findings suggest that activity in the SMC is associated with execution requirements shared by the simple and complex sequences independent of their differential cognitive requirements. In contrast, consistent with data in brain damaged patients, the left dorsal premotor and parietal areas are engaged when advanced planning is required to perform complex motor sequences that require selection of different effectors and abstract organization of the sequence, regardless of the performing hand.