Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
NARROW
Format
Journal
Date
Availability
1-2 of 2
Flor Kusnir
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Journal Articles
Sampling without Vision: Auditory Performance Fluctuates in Congenitally Blind Individuals
UnavailablePublisher: Journals Gateway
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1–13.
Published: 28 April 2025
Abstract
View articletitled, Sampling without Vision: Auditory Performance Fluctuates in Congenitally Blind Individuals
View
PDF
for article titled, Sampling without Vision: Auditory Performance Fluctuates in Congenitally Blind Individuals
In the past decade, studies have shown that attention fluctuates at ∼8 Hz, alternating between intervals of increased and decreased visual performance [Re, D., Karvat, G., & Landau, A. N. Attentional sampling between eye channels. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience , 35 , 1350–1360, 2023; Re, D., Inbar, M., Richter, C. G., & Landau, A. N. Feature-based attention samples stimuli report feature-based attention samples stimuli rhythmically. Current Biology , 1–7 , 2019; Helfrich, R. F., Fiebelkorn, I. C., Szczepanski, S. M., Lin, J. J., Parvizi, J., Knight, R. T., et al. Neural mechanisms of sustained attention are rhythmic. Neuron , 99 , 854–865, 2018; VanRullen, R. Perceptual cycles. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , 20 , 723–735, 2016; Fiebelkorn, I. C., Saalmann, Y. B., & Kastner, S. Rhythmic sampling within and between objects despite sustained attention at a cued location. Current Biology , 23 , 2553–2558, 2013; Landau, A. N., & Fries, P. Attention samples stimuli rhythmically. Current Biology , 22 , 1000–1004, 2012]. This modulation of performance, which has been observed primarily in the visual modality, also manifests in behavior and has been termed “attentional sampling.” In this study, we investigate whether sampling goes beyond vision and serves as a domain general mechanism shared by other perceptual systems. Specifically, we examined the auditory modality, in which there is contradicting evidence for endogenous sampling at similar frequencies [see VanRullen, R., Zoefel, B., & Ilhan, B. On the cyclic nature of perception in vision versus audition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences , 369 , 20130214, 2014]. In addition, we sought to investigate a putative role for visual experience in sampling in audition. To this end, sighted ( n = 21), sighted blindfolded ( n = 26), individuals with acquired blindness ( n = 13), and individuals with congenital blindness ( n = 12) detected a brief target (an intensity decrement) within an ongoing white noise stimulus. We observed 8- to 10-Hz sampling in the congenitally blind group only. We discuss this finding within the context of two possible, and even compatible, accounts. The first is that brain plasticity in the congenitally blind brings about attentional sampling in audition. It is possible that the lack of early visual experience drives the recruitment of “visual” cortices for auditory inputs, resulting in the same attentional sampling dynamics typically observed in vision, for audition. The second is that auditory sampling also exists in the sighted brain but might be obscured by visual inputs and other reflexive visual processes or might unfold at an entirely different rhythm. In fact, the acquired blind and the two sighted samples exhibited a significant low-frequency fluctuation at 2 Hz in their auditory performance. Although the study was not designed to investigate sampling at delta, this finding is consistent with a role for delta-band activity in audition as well as in temporal expectation mechanisms due to the temporal statistics of the utilized target times [e.g., Herbst, S. K., & Obleser, J. Implicit temporal predictability enhances pitch discrimination sensitivity and biases the phase of delta oscillations in auditory cortex. Neuroimage , 203 , 116198, 2019; Wilsch, A., Henry, M. J., Herrmann, B., Maess, B., & Obleser, J. Slow-delta phase concentration marks improved temporal expectations based on the passage of time. Psychophysiology , 52 , 910–918, 2015; Stefanics, G., Hangya, B., Hernádi, I., Winkler, I., Lakatos, P., & Ulbert, I. Phase entrainment of human delta oscillations can mediate the effects of expectation on reaction speed. Journal of Neuroscience , 30 , 13578–13585, 2010]. Interestingly, delta band sampling was absent in the congenitally blind group. To further substantiate a role for delta band sampling, it would be important to design paradigms better suited to study lower frequencies in behavior, both in sighted individuals and under different degrees of visual input processing.
Journal Articles
When Temporal Certainty Doesn't Help
UnavailablePublisher: Journals Gateway
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (2020) 32 (2): 315–325.
Published: 01 February 2020
FIGURES
| View All (5)
Abstract
View articletitled, When Temporal Certainty Doesn't Help
View
PDF
for article titled, When Temporal Certainty Doesn't Help
In a dynamically changing environment, the ability to capture regularities in our sensory input helps us generate predictions about future events. In most sensory systems, the basic finding is clear: Knowing when something will happen improves performance on it [Nobre, A. C., & van Ede, F. (2017). Anticipated moments: Temporal structure in attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience , 19 , 34–48, 2017]. We here examined the impact of temporal predictions on a less-explored modality: touch. Participants were instructed to detect a brief target embedded in an ongoing vibrotactile stimulus. Unbeknownst to them, the experiment had two timing conditions: In one part, the time of target onset was fixed and thus temporally predictable, whereas in the other, it could appear at a random time within the ongoing stimulation. We found a clear modulation of detection thresholds due to temporal predictability: Contrary to other sensory systems, detecting a predictable tactile target was worse relative to unpredictable targets. We discuss our findings within the framework of tactile suppression.