Do ongoing brain states determine conscious perception of an upcoming stimulus? Using the high temporal resolution of EEG, we investigated the relationship between prestimulus neuronal oscillations and the perceptibility of two competing somatosensory stimuli embedded in a backward masking paradigm. We identified two prestimulus EEG signatures predictive for a suprathreshold yet weak target stimulus to become perceptually resistant against masking by a stronger distractor stimulus: (i) over left frontal cortex a desynchronization of the regional beta rhythm (∼20 Hz) 500 msec prior to a perceived target, and (ii) a subsequent additional attenuation of both mu (∼10 Hz) and beta “idling” rhythms over those pericentral sensorimotor cortices which are going to process the upcoming target stimulus. Furthermore, across subjects the probability for target perception strongly correlates with the individual absolute level of pre-target amplitudes in these frequency bands and locations. These signatures significantly differed from the EEG characteristics preceding detected and undetected single stimuli. We suggest that the early activation of left frontal areas involved in top–down attentional control is critical for preventing backward masking and leads the preparation of primary sensory cortices: The ensuing prestimulus suppression of sensory idling rhythms warrants an intensified poststimulus processing, and thus, effectively promotes conscious perception of suprathreshold target stimuli embedded into an ecologically relevant condition featuring competing environmental stimuli.

The processing of executive control is thought to involve cortical as well as thalamic brain areas. However, the questions of how thalamic structures contribute to the control of behavior and how cortical versus thalamic processing is coordinated remain to be settled. We therefore aimed at specifying respective activations during the performance of a go/no-go task. To this end, an electroencephalogram was recorded simultaneously from scalp and thalamic electrodes in seven patients undergoing deep brain stimulation. Meanwhile, left- or right-directed precues were presented indicating with which index finger a button press should be putatively executed. Thereafter, 2 sec elapsed until a go or no-go stimulus determined if the prepared movement had to be performed or withheld. In fronto-central scalp as well as in thalamic recordings, event-related potentials upon go versus no-go instructions were expressed differentially. This task effect was unrelated to motor processes and emerged significantly prior at thalamic than at scalp level. Amplitude fluctuations of depth and scalp responses showed site- and task-dependent correlations, particularly between thalamic and no-go-related activities at frontal recording sites. We conclude that an early classification of go and no-go instructions is performed already thalamically. It further appears that this information is subsequently utilized by cortical areas engaged in the definite inhibition of the prepared action.