Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
NARROW
Format
Journal
TocHeadingTitle
Date
Availability
1-3 of 3
John C. Marshall
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Journal Articles
Neural Interaction between Spatial Domain and Spatial Reference Frame in Parietal–Occipital Junction
Publisher: Journals Gateway
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (2012) 24 (11): 2223–2236.
Published: 01 November 2012
FIGURES
| View All (6)
Abstract
View article
PDF
On the basis of double dissociations in clinical symptoms of patients with unilateral visuospatial neglect, neuropsychological research distinguishes between different spatial domains (near vs. far) and different spatial reference frames (egocentric vs. allocentric). In this fMRI study, we investigated the neural interaction between spatial domains and spatial reference frames by constructing a virtual three-dimensional world and asking participants to perform either allocentric or egocentric judgments on an object located in either near or far space. Our results suggest that the parietal–occipital junction (POJ) not only shows a preference for near-space processing but is also involved in the neural interaction between spatial domains and spatial reference frames. Two dissociable streams of visual processing exist in the human brain: a ventral perception-related stream and a dorsal action-related stream. Consistent with the perception–action model, both far-space processing and allocentric judgments draw upon the ventral stream whereas both near-space processing and egocentric judgments draw upon the dorsal stream. POJ showed higher neural activity during allocentric judgments (ventral) in near space (dorsal) and egocentric judgments (dorsal) in far space (ventral) as compared with egocentric judgments (dorsal) in near space (dorsal) and allocentric judgments (ventral) in far space (ventral). Because representations in the dorsal and ventral streams need to interact during allocentric judgments (ventral) in near space (dorsal) and egocentric judgments (dorsal) in far space (ventral), our results imply that POJ is involved in the neural interaction between the two streams. Further evidence for the suggested role of POJ as a neural interface between the dorsal and ventral streams is provided by functional connectivity analysis.
Journal Articles
Publisher: Journals Gateway
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (2000) 12 (2): 355–356.
Published: 01 March 2000
Journal Articles
Publisher: Journals Gateway
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (1997) 9 (2): 171–190.
Published: 01 March 1997
Abstract
View article
PDF
For more than a century, it has been known that damage to the right hemisphere of the brain can cause patients to be unaware of the contralesional side of space. This condition, known as unilateral neglect , represents a collection of clinically related spatial disorders characterized by the failure in free vision to respond, explore, or orient to stimuli predominantly located on the side of space opposite the damaged hemisphere. Recent studies using the simple task of line bisection , a conventional diagnostic test, have proven surprisingly revealing with respect to the spatial and attentional impairments involved in neglect. In line bisection, the patient is asked to mark the midpoint of a thin horizontal lie on a sheet of paper. Neglect patients generally transect far to the right of the center. Extensive studies of line bisection have been conducted, manipulating-among other factors-line length, orientation, and position. We have simulated the pattern of results using an existing computational model of visual perception and selective attention called MORSEL (Mozer, 1991). MORSEL has already been used to model data in a related disorder, neglect dyslexia (Mozer & Behrmann, 1990). In this earlier work, MORSEL was “lesioned” in accordance with the damage we suppose to have occurred in the brains of neglect patients. The same model and lesion can simulate the detailed pattern of performance on line bisection, including the following observations: (1) no consistent across-subject bias is found in normals; (2) transection displacements are proportional to line length in neglect patients; (3) variability of displacements is proportional to line length, in both normals and patients; (4) position of the lines with respect to the body or the page on which they are drawn has little effect; and (5) for lines drawn at different orientations, displacements are proportional to the cosine of the orientation angle. MORSEL fails to account for one observation: across patients, the variability of displacements for a particular line length is roughly proportional to mean displacement. Nonetheless, the overall fit of the model is sufficiently good that we believe MORSEL can be used as a diagnostic tool to characterize the specific nature of a patient's deficit, and thereby has potential down the line in therapy.