Current computational and neuroscientific models of decision-making posit a discrete, serial processing distinction between upstream decisional stages and downstream processes of motor-response implementation. We investigated this framework in the context of two-alternative forced-choice tasks on linguistic stimuli, words and pseudowords. In two experiments, we assessed the impact of lexical frequency and action semantics on two effector-selective EEG indexes of motor-response activation: the lateralized readiness potential and the lateralization of beta-frequency power. This allowed us to track potentially continuous streams of processing progressively mapping the evaluation of linguistic stimuli onto corresponding response channels. Whereas action semantics showed no influence on EEG indexes of motor-response activation, lexical frequency affected the lateralization of response-locked beta-frequency power. We argue that these observations point toward a continuity between linguistic processing of word input stimuli and implementation of corresponding choice in terms of motor behavior. This interpretation challenges the commonly held assumption of a discrete processing distinction between decisional and motor-response processes in the context of decisions based on symbolic stimuli.

Human activities consisting of multiple component actions require the generation of ordered sequences. This study investigated the scope of response planning in highly serial task, typing, by means of ERPs indexing motor response preparation. Specifically, we compared motor-related ERPs yielded by words typed using a single hand against words that had all keystrokes typed with a single hand, except for a deviant one, typed with the opposite hand. The deviant keystroke occurred either early in the typed sequence, corresponding to the second or third letters, or late, corresponding to the penultimate or last letter. Motor-related ERPs detected before response onset were affected only by deviant keystrokes located at the beginning of the sequence, whereas deviant keystrokes located at the end yielded ERPs that were undistinguishable from unimanual responses. These results impose some constraints on the notion of parallel processing of component actions.