Each day, humans must parse visual stimuli with varying amounts of perceptual experience, ranging from incredibly familiar to entirely new. Even when choosing a novel to buy at a bookstore, one sees covers they have repeatedly experienced intermixed with recently released titles. Visual exposure to stimuli has distinct neural correlates in the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) of nonhuman primates. However, it is currently unknown if this function may be localized to specific subregions within LPFC. Specifically, we aimed to determine whether the posterior fundus of Area 46 (p46f), an area that responds to deviations from learned sequences, also responds to less frequently presented stimuli outside of the sequential context. We compare responses in p46f to the adjacent subregion, posterior ventral area 46 (p46v), which we propose may be more likely to show exposure-dependent responses due to its proximity to novelty-responsive regions. To test whether p46f or p46v represent perceptual exposure, we performed awake fMRI on three male monkeys as they observed visual stimuli that varied in their number of daily presentations. Here, we show that p46v, but not p46f, shows preferential activation to stimuli with low perceptual exposure, further localizing exposure-dependent effects in monkey LPFC. These results align with previous research that has found novelty responses in ventral LPFC and are consistent with the proposal that p46f performs a sequence-specific function. Furthermore, they expand on our knowledge of the specific role of LPFC subregions and localize perceptual exposure processing within this broader brain region.

Cognitive neuroscience currently conflates the study of serial responses (e.g., delay match to sample/nonsample, n -back) with the study of sequential operations. In this essay, our goal is to define and disentangle the latter, termed abstract cognitive task sequences (ACTS). Existing literatures address tasks requiring serial events, including procedural learning of implicit motor responses, statistical learning of predictive relationships, and judgments of attributes. These findings do not describe the behavior and underlying mechanism required to succeed at remembering to evaluate color, then shape; or to multiply, then add. A new literature is needed to characterize these sorts of second-order cognitive demands of studying a sequence of operations. Our second goal is to characterize gaps in knowledge related to ACTS that merit further investigation. In the following sections, we define more precisely what we mean by ACTS and suggest research questions that further investigation would be positioned to address.