Because the human visual system is continually being bombarded with inputs, it is necessary to have effective mechanisms for filtering out irrelevant information. This is partly achieved by the allocation of attention, allowing the visual system to process relevant input while blocking out irrelevant input. What is the physiological substrate of attentional allocation? It has been proposed that alpha activity reflects functional inhibition. Here we asked if inhibition by alpha oscillations has behavioral consequences for suppressing the perception of unattended input. To this end, we investigated the influence of alpha activity on motion processing in two attentional conditions using magneto-encephalography. The visual stimuli used consisted of two random-dot kinematograms presented simultaneously to the left and right visual hemifields. Subjects were cued to covertly attend the left or right kinematogram. After 1.5 sec, a second cue tested whether subjects could report the direction of coherent motion in the attended (80%) or unattended hemifield (20%). Occipital alpha power was higher contralateral to the unattended side than to the attended side, thus suggesting inhibition of the unattended hemifield. Our key finding is that this alpha lateralization in the 20% invalidly cued trials did correlate with the perception of motion direction: Subjects with pronounced alpha lateralization were worse at detecting motion direction in the unattended hemifield. In contrast, lateralization did not correlate with visual discrimination in the attended visual hemifield. Our findings emphasize the suppressive nature of alpha oscillations and suggest that processing of inputs outside the field of attention is weakened by means of increased alpha activity.

Despite smooth pursuit eye movements, we are unaware of resultant retinal image motion. This example of perceptual invariance is achieved by comparing retinal image slip with an internal reference signal predicting the sensory consequences of the eye movement. This prediction can be manipulated experimentally, allowing one to vary the amount of self-induced image motion for which the reference signal compensates and, accordingly, the resulting percept of motion. Here we were able to map regions in CRUS I within the lateral cerebellar hemispheres that exhibited a significant correlation between functional magnetic resonance imaging signal amplitudes and the amount of motion predicted by the reference signal. The fact that these cerebellar regions were found to be functionally coupled with the left parieto-insular cortex and the supplementary eye fields points to these cortical areas as the sites of interaction between predicted and experienced sensory events, ultimately giving rise to the perception of a stable world despite self-induced retinal motion.

It is usually held that perceptual spatial stability, despite smooth pursuit eye movements, is accomplished by comparing a signal reflecting retinal image slip with an internal reference signal, encoding the eye movement. The important consequence of this concept is that our subjective percept of visual motion reflects the outcome of this comparison rather than retinal image slip. In an attempt to localize the cortical networks underlying this comparison and therefore our subjective percept of visual motion, we exploited an imperfection inherent in it, which results in a movement illusion. If smooth pursuit is carried out across a stationary background, we perceive a tiny degree of illusionary background motion (Filehne illusion, or FI), rather than experiencing the ecologically optimal percept of stationarity. We have recently shown that this illusion can be modified substantially and predictably under laboratory conditions by visual motion unrelated to the eye movement. By making use of this finding, we were able to compare cortical potentials evoked by pursuit-induced retinal image slip under two conditions, which differed perceptually, while being identical physically. This approach allowed us to discern a pair of potentials, a parieto-occipital negativity (N300) followed by a frontal positivity (P300), whose amplitudes were solely determined by the subjective perception of visual motion irrespective of the physical attributes of the situation. This finding strongly suggests that subjective awareness of visual motion depends on neuronal activity in a parietooccipito-frontal network, which excludes the early stages of visual processing.