In a previous experiment using scalp event-related potentials (ERPs), we have described the neuroelectric activities associated with the processing of gender information on human faces (Mouchetant-Rostaing, Giard, Bentin, Aguera, & Pernier, 2000). Here we extend this study by examining the processing of age on faces using a similar experimental paradigm, and we compare age and gender processing. In one session, faces were of the same gender (women) and of one age range (young or old), to reduce gender and age processing. In a second session, faces of young and old women were randomly intermixed but age was irrelevant for the task, hence, age discrimination, if any, was assumed to be incidental. In the third and fourth sessions, faces had to be explicitly categorized according to their age or gender, respectively (intentional discrimination). Neither age nor gender processing affected the occipito-temporal N170 component often associated with the detection of physiognomic features and global structural encoding of faces. Rather, the three age and gender discrimination conditions induced similar fronto-central activities around 145–185 msec. In our previous experiment, this ERP pattern was also found for implicit and explicit categorization of gender from faces but not in a control condition manipulating hand stimuli (Mouchetant-Rostaing, Giard, Bentin, et al., 2000). Whatever their exact nature, these 145–185 msec effects therefore suggest, first, that similar mechanisms could be engaged in age and gender perception, and second, that age and gender may be implicitly processed irrespective of their relevance to the task, through somewhat specialized mechanisms. Additional ERP effects were found at early latencies (45–90 msec) in all three discrimination conditions, and around 200–400 msec during explicit age and gender discrimination. These effects have been previously found in control conditions manipulating nonfacial stimuli and may therefore be related to more general categorization processes.

The aim of the present study was to examine the time course and scalp distribution of electrophysiological manifestations of the visual word recognition mechanism. Event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by visually presented lists of words were recorded while subjects were involved in a series of oddball tasks. The distinction between the designated target and nontarget stimuli was manipulated to induce a different level of processing in each session (visual, phonological/phonetic, phonological/lexical, and semantic). The ERPs of main interest in this study were those elicited by nontarget stimuli. In the visual task the targets were twice as big as the nontargets. Words, pseudowords, strings of consonants, strings of alphanumeric symbols, and strings of forms elicited a sharp negative peak at 170 msec (N170); their distribution was limited to the occipito-temporal sites. For the left hemisphere electrode sites, the N170 was larger for orthographic than for nonorthographic stimuli and vice versa for the right hemisphere. The ERPs elicited by all orthographic stimuli formed a clearly distinct cluster that was different from the ERPs elicited by nonorthographic stimuli. In the phonological/phonetic decision task the targets were words and pseudowords rhyming with the French word vitrail , whereas the nontargets were words, pseudowords, and strings of consonants that did not rhyme with vitrail . The most conspicuous potential was a negative peak at 320 msec, which was similarly elicited by pronounceable stimuli but not by nonpronounceable stimuli. The N320 was bilaterally distributed over the middle temporal lobe and was significantly larger over the left than over the right hemisphere. In the phonological/lexical processing task we compared the ERPs elicited by strings of consonants (among which words were selected), pseudowords (among which words were selected), and by words (among which pseudowords were selected). The most conspicuous potential in these tasks was a negative potential peaking at 350 msec (N350) elicited by phonologically legal but not by phonologically illegal stimuli. The distribution of the N350 was similar to that of the N320, but it was broader and including temporo-parietal areas that were not activated in the “rhyme” task. Finally, in the semantic task the targets were abstract words, and the nontargets were concrete words, pseudowords, and strings of consonants. The negative potential in this task peaked at 450 msec. Unlike the lexical decision, the negative peak in this task significantly distinguished not only between phonologically legal and illegal words but also between meaningful (words) and meaningless (pseudowords) phonologically legal structures. The distribution of the N450 included the areas activated in the lexical decision task but also areas in the fronto-central regions. The present data corroborated the functional neuro-anatomy of word recognition systems suggested by other neuroimaging methods and described their timecourse, supporting a cascade-type process that involves different but interconnected neural modules, each responsible for a different level of processing word-related information.