Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Summer 2002
July 01 2002
Single-Pair versus Multiple-Pair Answers: Wh-in-Situ and Scope
In Special Collection:
CogNet
Veneeta Dayal
Rutgers University
Online Issn: 1530-9150
Print Issn: 0024-3892
© 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2002
Linguistic Inquiry (2002) 33 (3): 512–520.
Citation
Veneeta Dayal; Single-Pair versus Multiple-Pair Answers: Wh-in-Situ and Scope. Linguistic Inquiry 2002; 33 (3): 512–520. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2002.33.3.512
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionEmail alerts
Advertisement
Related Articles
On the Syntax of Multiple Sluicing and What It Tells Us about Wh -Scope Taking
Linguistic Inquiry (May,2022)
Obligatory Overt Wh -Movement in a Wh -in-Situ Language
Linguistic Inquiry (January,2003)
Wh -in-Situ Does Not Correlate with Wh -Indefinites or Question Particles
Linguistic Inquiry (January,2007)
On the Nature of the Antiagreement Effect: Evidence from Wh -in-Situ in Ibibio
Linguistic Inquiry (October,2008)
Related Book Chapters
The EPP, Scrambling, and Wh-in-Situ
Ken Hale: A Life in Language
Wh-Interrogatives
Essays on the Representational and Derivational Nature of Grammar: The Diversity of Wh-Constructions
Wh-Constructions
WH-Movement: Moving On
A Theory Of Wh-Questions
Composing Questions