Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Summer 2007
July 01 2007
Whether We Tense-Agree Overtly or Not
In Special Collection:
CogNet
Rint Sybesma
Universiteit Leiden
Online Issn: 1530-9150
Print Issn: 0024-3892
© 2007 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2007
Linguistic Inquiry (2007) 38 (3): 580–587.
Citation
Rint Sybesma; Whether We Tense-Agree Overtly or Not. Linguistic Inquiry 2007; 38 (3): 580–587. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.3.580
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionEmail alerts
Advertisement
Related Articles
A Tenseless Analysis of Mandarin Chinese Revisited: A Response to Sybesma 2007
Linguistic Inquiry (April,2010)
Strengthening PF
Linguistic Inquiry (July,2000)
Have/Be Raising, Move F, and Procrastinate
Linguistic Inquiry (January,1998)
Long-Form and Short-Form Prenominal Adjectives Are Not Reduced Relative Clauses in Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian
Linguistic Inquiry (January,2017)
Related Book Chapters
Ten Years of CES
Public Finance and Public Policy in the New Century
Section II: Ten Perspectives
Iterate: Ten Lessons in Design and Failure
Ten Core Practices Defining Quest to Learn
Quest to Learn: Developing the School for Digital Kids
9 Whence? Whither? Whether?
On the Couch: A Repressed History of the Analytic Couch from Plato to Freud