Despite their apparent simplicity, the structure of DPs containing “complement” CPs (what we will call DCs) has long been obscure. One major strand of investigation has attempted to assimilate DCs to (close) nominal apposition, implying that N and CP form a structural unit that then combines with D. Danish has two kinds of DCs, a bare DC with the superficial structure [D N CP] and a prepositional DC in which the CP is encased in a PP. Exploiting clues provided by the allomorphy of the definite morpheme, we argue that the bare and prepositional DCs have very different structures, neither of which can be assimilated to apposition between N and CP. We further show that the two kinds of DC have distinct semantic and pragmatic properties. We then argue that English also has two different structures for DCs, and that they are plausibly parallel to the structures we establish for Danish. We conclude by arguing that two distinct structures give rise to the “apposition” relation: in one case it is between coarguments of D and in the other it is nonrestrictive composition.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Summer 2021
June 25 2021
CP Complements to D
In Special Collection:
CogNet
Jorge Hankamer,
Jorge Hankamer
Linguistics Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Line Mikkelsen
Line Mikkelsen
Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Jorge Hankamer
Linguistics Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, [email protected]
Line Mikkelsen
Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley, [email protected]
Online ISSN: 1530-9150
Print ISSN: 0024-3892
© 2020 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2020
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Linguistic Inquiry (2021) 52 (3): 473–518.
Citation
Jorge Hankamer, Line Mikkelsen; CP Complements to D. Linguistic Inquiry 2021; 52 (3): 473–518. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00387
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionEmail alerts
Advertisement
Related Articles
Structure, Architecture, and Blocking
Linguistic Inquiry (January,2018)
Don’t Rush to Rehabilitate: A Remark on Koeneman and Zeijlstra 2014
Linguistic Inquiry (January,2017)
Does D Select the CP in Light Verb Constructions? A Reply to Hankamer and Mikkelsen 2021
Linguistic Inquiry (July,2024)
The Syntax of Appositive Relativization: On Specifying Coordination, False Free Relatives, and Promotion
Linguistic Inquiry (April,2006)