The goal of this article is to understand the syntax of Icelandic indirect causatives (ICs), especially with respect to the implicit causee. We show that the complement of the causative verb must be at least as large as a VoiceP, and that it shares some properties with active VoicePs and others with passive VoicePs. We make sense of this state of affairs by proposing that the causee, while phonetically silent, has an explicit syntactic representation, but as a φP rather than a DP. We further propose that ICs are built by stacking a second VoiceP on top of the lexical verb’s first VoiceP, and that this configuration, along with the underspecified interpretation of φP, leads to a special thematic interpretation of both the causer and the implicit causee. Our analysis suggests that there are certain core ingredients involved in building ICs—such as stacked VoicePs and an underspecified causee—but that the source of these ingredients can vary across languages and constructions, depending on the formal primitives that grammars make available to the languages more generally.
Skip Nav Destination
June 25 2021
On the Implicit Argument of Icelandic Indirect Causatives
In Special Collection: CogNet
Einar Freyr Sigurðsson,
Einar Freyr Sigurðsson
Online ISSN: 1530-9150
Print ISSN: 0024-3892
© 2020 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Linguistic Inquiry (2021) 52 (3): 579–626.
Einar Freyr Sigurðsson, Jim Wood; On the Implicit Argument of Icelandic Indirect Causatives. Linguistic Inquiry 2021; 52 (3): 579–626. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00384
Download citation file: