An important discussion in theories of argument structure concerns the explanatory division of labor between thematic properties and event structure. English get-passives, analyzed in much previous work as differing thematically from be-passives, provide an interesting test case. We present an analysis of get-passives centered on the proposal that they contain additional event structure (realized as get) relative to their be counterparts. We employ by-adjuncts to identify the different event structures in passive types, and use other diagnostics to support our analysis. Further discussion considers the prominent proposal from previous studies that get-passives differ thematically from be-passives in (sometimes) assigning an Agent role to their surface subjects. We show that contrasts between get and be on this dimension are a consequence of event-structural differences between the two. The result is a unified analysis of the get-passive that has implications for the role of event structure in understanding the syntax and interpretation of arguments.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Spring 2022
April 28 2022
On the Event-Structural Properties of the English Get-Passive
In Special Collection:
CogNet
Alison Biggs,
Alison Biggs
Linguistics Department, Georgetown University, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
David Embick
David Embick
Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Alison Biggs
Linguistics Department, Georgetown University, [email protected]
David Embick
Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania, [email protected]
Online ISSN: 1530-9150
Print ISSN: 0024-3892
© 2020 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2020
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Linguistic Inquiry (2022) 53 (2): 211–254.
Citation
Alison Biggs, David Embick; On the Event-Structural Properties of the English Get-Passive. Linguistic Inquiry 2022; 53 (2): 211–254. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00405
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionEmail alerts
Advertisement
Cited By
Related Articles
Manner and Result in the Roots of Verbal Meaning
Linguistic Inquiry (July,2012)
Partial Truths: Adults Choose to Mention Agents and Patients in Proportion to Informativity, Even If It Doesn’t Fully Disambiguate the Message
Open Mind (December,2017)
The Dative Dispositional Construction in Russian
Linguistic Inquiry (March,2020)
Depictive Secondary Predicates and Small Clause Approaches to Argument Structure
Linguistic Inquiry (July,2018)