Recent proposals on phases claim that locality restrictions are obviated when the subject of a clausal phase has certain syntactic or discourse properties, suggesting that phasehood is acquired over the course of a derivation. I evaluate these claims with acceptability judgment experiments and argue that these phase-related locality effects can be derived from independently motivated principles, such as Feature Inheritance/Value-Transfer Simultaneity or the Principle of Minimal Compliance. I further point out similar effects with possessors and nominals in English, expanding the empirical domain. The nominal data constitute a novel argument for treating nominals as phases and strengthen the case for a general theory of phases that can account for these effects.
Skip Nav Destination
July 06 2022
How Subjects and Possessors Can Obviate Phasehood
Online Issn: 1530-9150
Print Issn: 0024-3892
© 2020 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Linguistic Inquiry (2022) 53 (3): 427–458.
- Share Icon Share
- Views Icon Views
- Search Site
Nick Huang; How Subjects and Possessors Can Obviate Phasehood. Linguistic Inquiry 2022; 53 (3): 427–458. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00414
Download citation file: