The Final-over-Final Condition (FOFC) rules out head-final projections that immediately dominate head-initial projections. Syntactically inert particles are known to show (apparent) exceptions to FOFC. However, Biberauer (2017) argues that seemingly FOFC-violating particles comply with a version of FOFC that is relativized to heads within an extended projection (Biberauer, Holmberg, and Roberts 2014). I present novel data from Amahuaca (Panoan; Peru) in which FOFC is violated by tense-aspect-mood particles within the verbal extended projection. I argue that this FOFC violation cannot be explained by the mechanisms proposed by Biberauer (2017). Instead, a view of FOFC grounded in restrictions on rightward dependencies (Cecchetto 2013, Zeijlstra 2016) predicts the type of exception found in Amahuaca.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Fall 2022
October 03 2022
Disharmony and the Final-Over-Final Condition in Amahuaca
In Special Collection:
CogNet
Emily Clem
Emily Clem
Department of Linguistics, University of California, San Diego, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Emily Clem
Department of Linguistics, University of California, San Diego, [email protected]
Online ISSN: 1530-9150
Print ISSN: 0024-3892
© 2021 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2021
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Linguistic Inquiry (2022) 53 (4): 809–822.
Citation
Emily Clem; Disharmony and the Final-Over-Final Condition in Amahuaca. Linguistic Inquiry 2022; 53 (4): 809–822. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00425
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionEmail alerts
Advertisement
Cited By
Related Articles
The Final-over-Final Condition, Stringency, and Typological Structure
Linguistic Inquiry (October,2020)
Cyclic Expansion in Agree: Maximal Projections as Probes
Linguistic Inquiry (December,2022)
Rightward DP-Movement Licenses Parasitic Gaps: A Reply to Postal 1994
Linguistic Inquiry (January,2016)
Eliminating Rightward Movement: Extraposition as Flexible Linearization of Adjuncts
Linguistic Inquiry (April,2014)