When we couple the cyclic expansion of a probe’s domain assumed in Cyclic Agree (Rezac 2003, 2004, Béjar and Rezac 2009) with the lack of formal distinction between heads, intermediate projections, and phrases emphasized in Bare Phrase Structure (Chomsky 1995a,b), an interesting prediction arises. Maximal projections should be able to probe through the same mechanisms that allow intermediate projections to probe in familiar cases of Cyclic Agree. I argue that this prediction is borne out. I analyze agreeing adjunct C in Amahuaca (Panoan; Peru) as a maximal projection that probes its c-command domain in second-cycle Agree. This account derives C’s simultaneous sensitivity to DPs within its own clause and in the clause to which it adjoins. Therefore, I conclude that Amahuaca provides evidence that maximal projections can be probes. The account also yields insight into the syntax of switch-reference in Panoan and beyond.
Skip Nav Destination
December 22 2022
Cyclic Expansion in Agree: Maximal Projections as Probes
In Special Collection: CogNet
Online Issn: 1530-9150
Print Issn: 0024-3892
© 2021 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Linguistic Inquiry (2022) 54 (1): 39–78.
- Share Icon Share
- Views Icon Views
- Search Site
Emily Clem; Cyclic Expansion in Agree: Maximal Projections as Probes. Linguistic Inquiry 2022; 54 (1): 39–78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00432
Download citation file: