We present two offline experiments on the interpretation in German and English of doubly quantified sentences with an existential subject and a universal object, which have been reported to allow for inverse readings only in English. We show for this specific syntactic configuration that there is no categorical crosslinguistic difference, but only a gradual one, with English more readily allowing for inverse scope than German. These results support a crosslinguistically unified analysis of inverse scope on which gradual differences between languages follow from language-specific properties and exposure effects. Moreover, they suggest that relative clauses with indefinite head NPs allow for inverse readings, thereby challenging the status of these clauses as scope islands (May 1977, Huang 1995), while according with introspective claims in semantic accounts (Barker 2012, 2019). Finally, our results suggest a high between-speaker variability and a strong impact of pragmatics.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
July 14 2023
An Experimental Comparison of the Availability of Inverse Scope in English and German
In Special Collection:
CogNet
Mareike Philipp,
Mareike Philipp
Department of Linguistics, University of Potsdam, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Malte Zimmermann
Malte Zimmermann
Department of Linguistics, University of Potsdam, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Mareike Philipp
Department of Linguistics, University of Potsdam, [email protected]
Malte Zimmermann
Department of Linguistics, University of Potsdam, [email protected]
Online ISSN: 1530-9150
Print ISSN: 0024-3892
© 2022 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2022
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Linguistic Inquiry 1–37.
Citation
Mareike Philipp, Malte Zimmermann; An Experimental Comparison of the Availability of Inverse Scope in English and German. Linguistic Inquiry 2023; doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00493
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionEmail alerts
101
Views
Advertisement
Cited By
Related Articles
Rethinking Scope Islands
Linguistic Inquiry (October,2022)
A Remark on the Economics of Quantifier Raising
Linguistic Inquiry (March,2020)
Sluicing, Idioms, and Island Repair
Linguistic Inquiry (October,2013)
Against Tanglewood by Focus Movement: A Reply to Erlewine and Kotek 2018
Linguistic Inquiry (July,2020)