After decades of research, opinions are still split over whether geminates should be represented as long or as heavy. We attempt to resolve this issue by entertaining a model that rests on the assumption that all underlying geminates are moraic consonants but they might not emerge as such on the surface. We argue that this intuition—due to Davis (2011)—can be formalized in a theoretical model where (a) different degrees of prosodic integration are possible and (b) phonetic interpretation can refer to the difference between epenthetic and underlying elements. This model predicts that the questions of whether a mora has an effect for segmental length and whether it has an effect for syllabic weight are independent from each other. We show that this representational consequence correctly predicts the typology of attested combinations of geminates in different positions and singleton coda consonants in the languages of the world.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
July 14 2023
Reconciling “Heavy” and “Long”: The Typology of Lexical Geminates
In Special Collection:
CogNet
Nina Topintzi,
Nina Topintzi
School of English, Faculty of Philosophy, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Eva Zimmermann
Eva Zimmermann
Department of Linguistics, Leipzig University, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Nina Topintzi
School of English, Faculty of Philosophy, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, [email protected]
Eva Zimmermann
Department of Linguistics, Leipzig University, [email protected]
Online ISSN: 1530-9150
Print ISSN: 0024-3892
© 2022 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2022
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Linguistic Inquiry 1–41.
Citation
Nina Topintzi, Eva Zimmermann; Reconciling “Heavy” and “Long”: The Typology of Lexical Geminates. Linguistic Inquiry 2023; doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00499
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionEmail alerts
97
Views
Advertisement
Cited By
Related Articles
VV > VC > V for Stress: Coercion vs. Prominence
Linguistic Inquiry (January,2020)