Question meaning is built up at three points in the interrogative left periphery. An interrogative is differentiated semantically from a declarative at CP. It becomes a request for information by the speaker, directed toward the addressee, at SAP (Speech Act Phrase). In between is PerspP (Perspective Phrase), which introduces PRO, an individual for whom the interrogative CP is potentially active. PRO is the perspectival center, the individual from whose point of view the interrogative can be a request for information. When the speaker argument in SAP binds PRO, we get a matrix question. When a matrix subject binds PRO, we get quasi-subordination. Quasi-subordination is a hybrid between true subordination (with respect to pronominal interpretation, for example) and matrix questions (with respect to intonation, for example). Restrictions on quasi-subordination are regulated by, in addition to standard selectional restrictions, semantic compatibility between the implied ignorance of the individual who is the perspectival center of the question and the meaning of the embedding clause. Empirical support for this view of the interrogative left periphery comes from a range of phenomena from unrelated languages. Several further implications are discussed, making connections to similar proposals about other clause types and to developments in our understanding of how complement selection works.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
November 14 2023
The Interrogative Left Periphery: How a Clause Becomes a Question
In Special Collection:
CogNet
Veneeta Dayal
Veneeta Dayal
Department of Linguistics, Yale University, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Veneeta Dayal
Department of Linguistics, Yale University, [email protected]
Online ISSN: 1530-9150
Print ISSN: 0024-3892
© 2023 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2023
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Linguistic Inquiry 1–50.
Citation
Veneeta Dayal; The Interrogative Left Periphery: How a Clause Becomes a Question. Linguistic Inquiry 2023; doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00507
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionEmail alerts
Advertisement
Cited By
Related Articles
Wh -in-Situ Does Not Correlate with Wh -Indefinites or Question Particles
Linguistic Inquiry (January,2007)
The Interpretation of Prosody in Disjunctive Questions
Linguistic Inquiry (October,2013)
Why * if or not but ✓ whether or not
Linguistic Inquiry (April,2022)
Meaning and Prosody of Wh -Indeterminates in Korean
Linguistic Inquiry (June,2019)