Skip to Main Content

Advertisement

MIT Press Direct, home
header search
Search
Advanced Search
Skip Nav Destination

On the Light Verb Hypothesis

Linguistic Inquiry (2001) 32 (2): 362–369.
This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.
Agree feeds interpretation: Evidence from Japanese object honorifics
  • Shiori Ikawa
Syntax (2022) 25 (4): 508.
Data convergence in syntactic theory and the role of sentence pairs
  • Tom S. Juzek
  • Jana Häussler
Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft (2020) 39 (2): 109.
The syntax of Korean VP anaphora: an experimental investigation
  • Kyeong-min Kim
  • Chung-hye Han
  • Keir Moulton
Journal of East Asian Linguistics (2020) 29 (1): 31.
Do it anaphora without covert events: In defense of a pro-verb analysis
  • Andrés Colapinto
Lingua (2020) 245: 102921.
Passive do so
  • Benjamin Bruening
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory (2019) 37 (1): 1.
No I-to-C Movement in the So Do Construction
Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics (2018) 18 (1): 78.
A compositional analysis of VP anaphors
  • Gabriel Flambard
Anglophonia (2017) (23)
Evidence for deletion in as-parentheticals
  • Nicholas LaCara
The Linguistic Review (2016) 33 (4)
BeyondDo-Support andTun-Periphrasis: The Case of Finite Verb Doubling in Karrharde North Frisian
  • Jarich Hoekstra
Journal of Germanic Linguistics (2016) 28 (4): 317.
How to do so in Mandarin Chinese
  • Ting-Chi Wei
  • Yen-hui Audrey Li
Journal of East Asian Linguistics (2016) 25 (2): 183.
Do it, do so, and VP-ellipsis
Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics (2016) 16 (3): 469.
Not Voice but Case Match Matters in VP Ellipsis and Pseudogapping of English
Korean Journal of Linguistics (2015) 40 (2): 169.
On the Variation of English Light Verbs Have and Take: A Corpus-based Analysis.
English Language and Linguistics (2015) 21 (1): 1.
Extraction out of overt anaphora: Korean kule(h) 'so' versus English so
Linguistic Research (2015) 32 (3): 693.
Degree achievements, telicity and the verbal prefixmeN-in Malay
  • HOOI LING SOH
  • HIROKI NOMOTO
Journal of Linguistics (2015) 51 (1): 147.
Two types of datives in Spanish: Caused possession vs. possessor raising
  • Héctor Fernández-Alcalde
Acta Linguistica Hungarica (2014) 61 (1): 69.
Predication and movement in passive
  • Peter Hallman
Lingua (2013) 125: 76.
The Syntactic Licensing of Ellipsis
  • TERUHIKO FUKAYA
ENGLISH LINGUISTICS (2012) 29 (1): 144.
Against ‘DummyDo’: The ‘LowDoAUX’ Hypothesis1
  • José Luis González Escribano
Transactions of the Philological Society (2012) 110 (1): 1.
영어조동사 do의 발생과 이해
The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal (2012) 20 (2): 41.
On the Light Preposition Hypothesis
Korean Journal of Linguistics (2011) 36 (1): 243.
Two Types of So-Inversion: So Similar but Quite Different
Korean Journal of Linguistics (2010) 35 (3): 591.
Stylistic Fronting: A Syntax-Phonology Interface
Studies in Generative Grammar (2008) 18 (2): 207.
The Structural Deficiency of Verbal Pro-Forms
  • Bill Haddican
Linguistic Inquiry (2007) 38 (3): 539.
So-Inversion Revisited
  • Tatsuhiko Toda
Linguistic Inquiry (2007) 38 (1): 188.
Japanese syntactic nominalization and VP-internal syntax
  • Hideki Kishimoto
Lingua (2006) 116 (6): 771.
Light verbs and structural case
  • Gholamhossein Karimi-Doostan
Lingua (2005) 115 (12): 1737.
THE ROLE OF LIGHT VERB PROJECTION IN TRANSITIVITY ALTERNATION
  • HIROMU SAKAI
  • ADRIAN IVANA
  • CHAO ZHANG
ENGLISH LINGUISTICS (2004) 21 (2): 348.

Advertisement

  • Online ISSN 1530-9150
  • Print ISSN 0024-3892
A product of The MIT Press
Newsletter sign up

MIT Press Direct

Information

MIT Press

Contact Us

© 2023 The MIT Press
Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. No content on this site may be used to train artificial intelligence systems without permission in writing from the MIT Press.
Accept