Have/Be Raising, Move F, and Procrastinate

Skip Nav Destination

Linguistic Inquiry (1998) 29 (1): 113–125.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

Constraining Head-Stranding Ellipsis

Idan Landau

Linguistic Inquiry (2020) 51 (2): 281.

A Scope Argument against T‐to‐C Movement in Sluicing

Idan Landau

Syntax (2020) 23 (4): 375.

Reduced Relatives and Extended Phases: A Phase-Based Analysis of the Inflectional Restrictions on English Reduced Relative Clauses

William Harwood

Studia Linguistica (2018) 72 (2): 428.

To be or not to be elided: VP ellipsis revisited

Lobke Aelbrecht
William Harwood

Lingua (2015) 153: 66.

Being progressive is just a phase: celebrating the uniqueness of progressive aspect under a phase-based analysis

William Harwood

Natural Language & Linguistic Theory (2015) 33 (2): 523.

Now I’m a Phase, Now I’m Not a Phase: On the Variability of Phases with Extraction and Ellipsis

Željko Bošković

Linguistic Inquiry (2014) 45 (1): 27.

Verbal complex formation and negation in Japanese

Hideki Kishimoto

Lingua (2013) 135: 132.

Against ‘Dummy Do’: The ‘Low DoAUX’ Hypothesis1

José Luis González Escribano

Transactions of the Philological Society (2012) 110 (1): 1.

On Headless XP-Movement/Ellipsis

Kenshi Funakoshi

Linguistic Inquiry (2012) 43 (4): 519.

A Continuum Approach to English Verbal Affixation

Studies in Generative Grammar (2009) 19 (1): 1.

On the variability of negative scope in Japanese

HIDEKI KISHIMOTO

Journal of Linguistics (2008) 44 (2): 379.

Word Order Paradox and PF effects of Traces

Studies in Generative Grammar (2008) 18 (1): 1.

Modal Phrase, Movement, and To-Infinitival Clauses (T. Nomura, ModalP and Subjunctive Present)

FUMINORI MATSUBARA

ENGLISH LINGUISTICS (2008) 25 (1): 175.

The syntactic derivations of two paired dependency constructions

Niina Ning Zhang

Lingua (2007) 117 (12): 2134.

Negative scope and head raising in Japanese

Hideki Kishimoto

Lingua (2007) 117 (1): 247.

Short-Distance Reanalysis of Middle English Modals: Evidence from Ellipsis

Remus Gergel

Studia Linguistica (2004) 58 (2): 53.

Is isn't be

Misha Becker

Lingua (2004) 114 (4): 399.

Auxiliary selection and the semantics of unaccusativity

Delia Bentley
Thórhallur Eythórsson

Lingua (2004) 114 (4): 447.

Syntactic parallels between ontogeny and phylogeny

Fuyo Osawa

Lingua (2003) 113 (1): 3.

Building and Merging, not Checking: The Nonexistence of (Aux)-S-V-O Languages

Mark C. Baker

Linguistic Inquiry (2002) 33 (2): 321.

Features, θ-Roles, and Free Constituent Order

Gisbert Fanselow

Linguistic Inquiry (2001) 32 (3): 405.

Strengthening PF

Juvénal Ndayiragije

Linguistic Inquiry (2000) 31 (3): 485.

Some remarks on the diachrony of French negation

Ian ROBERTS

DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada (2000) 16 (spe): 201.

Illicit Remnant Movement: An Argument for Feature-Driven Movement

Yuji Takano

Linguistic Inquiry (2000) 31 (1): 141.

Indefinite Pronouns and Overt N-Raising

Hideki Kishimoto

Linguistic Inquiry (2000) 31 (3): 557.

TRANSPARENCY IN BARE INFINITIVE COMPLEMENTS IN ENGLISH AND OVERT FEATURE MOVEMENT

TETSUYA MATSUYAMA

ENGLISH LINGUISTICS (1999) 16 (2): 405.

ON THE QUOTATIVE CONSTRUCTION IN ENGLISH: A MINIMALIST ACCOUNT

ISAMU GYODA

ENGLISH LINGUISTICS (1999) 16 (2): 275.

DO-SUPPORT AND TIER SCANSION: A MINIMALIST ACCOUNT OF HMC EFFECTS

HITOSHI AKAHANE

ENGLISH LINGUISTICS (1998) 15 (0): 81.

Have/Be Raising, Move F, and Procrastinate

A product of The MIT Press

MIT Press Direct

Information

MIT Press

Contact Us

Have/Be Raising, Move F, and Procrastinate

A product of The MIT Press

MIT Press Direct

Information

MIT Press

Contact Us

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only