Movement from the Double Object Construction Is Not Fully Symmetrical | Citedby Results | Linguistic Inquiry | MIT Press

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

Movement from the Double Object Construction Is Not Fully Symmetrical

Linguistic Inquiry (2019) 50 (4): 677–722.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

Licensing and anaphora in Tenyidie

Andrew Murphy
Savio Meyase

Glossa: a journal of general linguistics (2022) 7 (1)

Locality and Antilocality: The Logic of Conflicting Requirements

Kenyon Branan

Linguistic Inquiry (2022) 54 (1): 1.

On the Limits of Across-the-Board Movement: Distributed Extraction Coordinations

Željko Bošković

Philosophies (2022) 7 (1): 10.

Revisiting extraction and subextraction patterns from arguments

Luis Miguel Toquero-Pérez

Linguistic Variation (2022) 22 (1): 123.

Explaining Siewierska’s generalization

Peter Hallman

The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics (2021) 24 (2): 145.

General linguistics must be based on universals (or non-conventional aspects of language)

Martin Haspelmath

Theoretical Linguistics (2021) 47 (1-2): 1.

Multi-Functionality of the Discourse Marker haweɪh in Ghamdi Dialect of Hijazi Arabic: Interaction of CP-Features? – A Minimalist-Cartographic Account

Alshamari Murdhy
Al-Ghamdi Naimah
Jeroen van de Weijer

Cogent Arts & Humanities (2021) 8 (1)

Applied Objects and the Syntax–Semantics Interface

KYLE JERRO

Journal of Linguistics (2021) 57 (2): 365.