Skip to Main Content

Advertisement

MIT Press Direct, home
header search
Search
Advanced Search
Skip Nav Destination

Issues

Volume 35, Issue 2
Spring 2004
Issue Cover
All Issues
ISSN 0024-3892
EISSN 1530-9150
In this Issue
Disjunction, Focus, and Scope
Chung-hye Han, Maribel Romero
Linguistic Inquiry (2004) 35 (2): 179–217.
View articletitled, Disjunction, Focus, and Scope
Open the PDF for in another window
Using Inconsistency Detection to Overcome Structural Ambiguity
Bruce Tesar
Linguistic Inquiry (2004) 35 (2): 219–253.
View articletitled, Using Inconsistency Detection to Overcome Structural Ambiguity
Open the PDF for in another window
On Indefinite Pronoun Structures with APs: Reply to Kishimoto
Richard K. Larson, Franc Marušič
Linguistic Inquiry (2004) 35 (2): 268–287.
View articletitled, On Indefinite Pronoun Structures with APs: Reply to Kishimoto
Open the PDF for in another window
Semitic Relatives
Jamal Ouhalla
Linguistic Inquiry (2004) 35 (2): 288–300.
View articletitled, Semitic Relatives
Open the PDF for in another window
French Bare Arguments Are Not Extinct: The Case of Coordinated Bare Nouns
Jasper Roodenburg
Linguistic Inquiry (2004) 35 (2): 301–313.
View articletitled, French Bare Arguments Are Not Extinct: The Case of Coordinated Bare Nouns
Open the PDF for in another window
Long-Distance Agreement and the Syntax of for-to Infinitives
Ilan Hazout
Linguistic Inquiry (2004) 35 (2): 338–343.
View articletitled, Long-Distance Agreement and the Syntax of <em>for-to</em> Infinitives
Open the PDF for in another window
Indefinites in Verb Phrase Ellipsis
Bernhard Schwarz
Linguistic Inquiry (2004) 35 (2): 344–353.
View articletitled, Indefinites in Verb Phrase Ellipsis
Open the PDF for in another window

Remarks and Replies

Wanting, Having, and Getting: A Note on Fodor and Lepore 1998
Heidi Harley
Linguistic Inquiry (2004) 35 (2): 255–267.
View articletitled, Wanting, Having, and Getting: A Note on Fodor and Lepore 1998
Open the PDF for in another window

Squibs and Discussion

Are There “Double Relative Clauses” in Korean?
Chung-hye Han, Jong-Bok Kim
Linguistic Inquiry (2004) 35 (2): 315–337.
View articletitled, Are There “Double Relative Clauses” in Korean?
Open the PDF for in another window

Product(s) added to cart

Go to Cart Continue Browsing
Close Modal

Advertisement

Advertisement

  • Online ISSN 1530-9150
  • Print ISSN 0024-3892
A product of The MIT Press
Newsletter sign up

MIT Press Direct

Information

MIT Press

Contact Us

© 2023 The MIT Press
Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. No content on this site may be used to train artificial intelligence systems without permission in writing from the MIT Press.
Accept