Binding theory Condition A must be so formulated as to accommodate the range of behaviors exhibited by anaphors crosslinguistically. In this respect, the behavior of the Modern Greek anaphor o eaftos mu is theoretically important, as it has been reported to display a number of unusual distributional properties. This has led to treatments by Iatridou (1988) and Anagnostopoulou and Everaert (1999) different from the treatment of standard anaphors represented by English himself , thus requiring a rethinking of the classic Condition A descriptive generalization and its theoretical derivation. This article revisits the distribution of this expression, documenting that previous discussions are subject to a confound as this expression (a) is not always a reflexive and (b) has logophoric uses. Controlling for the nonanaphoric use of o eaftos mu as well as for logophoricity and relying on new data surveys, we conclude that when anaphoric, it is in fact a well-behaved standard anaphor from the point of view of the standard Condition A (akin to the version in Chomsky 1986).