Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
NARROW
Format
Journal
Date
Availability
1-1 of 1
Shanti Ulfsbjorninn
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Journal Articles
Publisher: Journals Gateway
Linguistic Inquiry (2024) 55 (2): 255–286.
Published: 04 April 2024
Abstract
View articletitled, Nasal Assimilation Counterfeeding and Allomorphy in Haitian: Nothing Is Still Something!
View
PDF
for article titled, Nasal Assimilation Counterfeeding and Allomorphy in Haitian: Nothing Is Still Something!
Haitian has optional regressive nasal assimilation in a vowel-nasal (VN) context: /fami/ [fãmi] ‘family’. It is found also in recent loan-words in contexts where the source lacks phonetic nasalization. This process systematically underapplies in VNs that correspond to vowel- rhotic-nasal (VRN) sequences in French: [ʃãm] chambre ‘room’ vs. [ʃam] cha r me ‘charm’. We claim that etymological VRN and VR# have a different synchronic description: VRNs have no R, but VR#s do. VRNs crucially contain an empty CV that disrupts the locality between the trigger/target of nasal assimilation, hence the counterfeeding: /ʃam/ = [ʃãm] ‘room’ vs. /ʃa CV m/ = [ʃam] / *[ʃãm] ‘charm’. According to this analysis, only VR#s have synchronic R: [tε] ‘land’ vs. [ã-teʀ-e] ‘to land’. VR# forms interact with the morphology in interesting ways. Haitian has a case of nonoptimizing phonologically conditioned allomorph selection (PCA), /-a/ after V and /-la/ after C: [lapli-a] ‘the rain’ vs. [ʃat-la] ‘the cat’. However, here VR# forms create opaque and nonoptimizing R-less forms: [tε-a] / *[tε-ʀa] ‘the land’ (cf. [ã-teʀ-e] ‘to land’). This is solved with underlying floating consonants and a prevocalic phonological condition on R. PCA selection is eliminated since the surface variants are generated phonologically from unique underlying forms.