Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
NARROW
Format
Journal
TocHeadingTitle
Date
Availability
1-3 of 3
Jonathan Tapson
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Journal Articles
Publisher: Journals Gateway
Neural Computation (2014) 26 (3): 472–496.
Published: 01 March 2014
FIGURES
| View All (23)
Abstract
View article
PDF
Bayesian spiking neurons (BSNs) provide a probabilistic interpretation of how neurons perform inference and learning. Online learning in BSNs typically involves parameter estimation based on maximum-likelihood expectation-maximization (ML-EM) which is computationally slow and limits the potential of studying networks of BSNs. An online learning algorithm, fast learning (FL), is presented that is more computationally efficient than the benchmark ML-EM for a fixed number of time steps as the number of inputs to a BSN increases (e.g., 16.5 times faster run times for 20 inputs). Although ML-EM appears to converge 2.0 to 3.6 times faster than FL, the computational cost of ML-EM means that ML-EM takes longer to simulate to convergence than FL. FL also provides reasonable convergence performance that is robust to initialization of parameter estimates that are far from the true parameter values. However, parameter estimation depends on the range of true parameter values. Nevertheless, for a physiologically meaningful range of parameter values, FL gives very good average estimation accuracy, despite its approximate nature. The FL algorithm therefore provides an efficient tool, complementary to ML-EM, for exploring BSN networks in more detail in order to better understand their biological relevance. Moreover, the simplicity of the FL algorithm means it can be easily implemented in neuromorphic VLSI such that one can take advantage of the energy-efficient spike coding of BSNs.
Journal Articles
Publisher: Journals Gateway
Neural Computation (2013) 25 (2): 510–531.
Published: 01 February 2013
FIGURES
| View All (9)
Abstract
View article
PDF
This letter discusses temporal order coding and detection in nervous systems. Detection of temporal order in the external world is an adaptive function of nervous systems. In addition, coding based on the temporal order of signals can be used as an internal code. Such temporal order coding is a subset of temporal coding. We discuss two examples of processing the temporal order of external events: the auditory location detection system in birds and the visual direction detection system in flies. We then discuss how somatosensory stimulus intensities are translated into a temporal order code in the human peripheral nervous system. We next turn our attention to input order coding in the mammalian cortex. We review work demonstrating the capabilities of cortical neurons for detecting input order. We then discuss research refuting and demonstrating the representation of stimulus features in the cortex by means of input order. After some general theoretical considerations on input order detection and coding, we conclude by discussing the existing and potential use of input order coding in neuromorphic engineering.
Journal Articles
Publisher: Journals Gateway
Neural Computation (2009) 21 (6): 1554–1588.
Published: 01 June 2009
FIGURES
| View All (15)
Abstract
View article
PDF
We present a first-order nonhomogeneous Markov model for the interspike-interval density of a continuously stimulated spiking neuron. The model allows the conditional interspike-interval density and the stationary interspike-interval density to be expressed as products of two separate functions, one of which describes only the neuron characteristics and the other of which describes only the signal characteristics. The approximation shows particularly clearly that signal autocorrelations and cross-correlations arise as natural features of the interspike-interval density and are particularly clear for small signals and moderate noise. We show that this model simplifies the design of spiking neuron cross-correlation systems and describe a four-neuron mutual inhibition network that generates a cross-correlation output for two input signals.