Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
NARROW
Format
Journal
Date
Availability
1-1 of 1
Kiyohiko Nakamura
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Journal Articles
Publisher: Journals Gateway
Neural Computation (1998) 10 (3): 567–595.
Published: 01 April 1998
Abstract
View articletitled, Neural Processing in the Subsecond Time Range in the Temporal Cortex
View
PDF
for article titled, Neural Processing in the Subsecond Time Range in the Temporal Cortex
The hypothesis that cortical processing of the millisecond time range is performed by latency competition between the first spikes produced by neuronal populations is analyzed. First, theorems that describe how the mechanism of latency competition works in a model cortex are presented. The model is a sequence of cortical areas, each of which is an array of neuronal populations that laterally inhibit each other. Model neurons are integrate-and-fire neurons. Second, the model is applied to the ventral pathway of the temporal lobe, and neuronal activity of the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey is reproduced with the model pathway. It consists of seven areas: V1, V2/V3, V4, PIT, CIT, AIT, and STPa. Neural activity predicted with the model is compared with empirical data. There are four main results: (1) Neural responses of the area STPa of the model showed the same fast discrimination between stimuli that the corresponding responses of the monkey did: both were significant within 5 ms of the response onset. (2) The hypothesis requires that the response latency of cortical neurons should be shorter for stronger responses. This requirement was verified by both the model simulation and the empirical data. (3) The model reproduced fast discrimination even when spontaneous random firing of 9 Hz was introduced to all the cells. This suggests that the latency competition performed by neuronal populations is robust. (4) After the first few competitions, the mechanism of latency competition always detected the strongest of input activations with different latencies.