Ordinal regression is aimed at predicting an ordinal class label. In this letter, we consider its semisupervised formulation, in which we have unlabeled data along with ordinal-labeled data to train an ordinal regressor. There are several metrics to evaluate the performance of ordinal regression, such as the mean absolute error, mean zero-one error, and mean squared error. However, the existing studies do not take the evaluation metric into account, restrict model choice, and have no theoretical guarantee. To overcome these problems, we propose a novel generic framework for semisupervised ordinal regression based on the empirical risk minimization principle that is applicable to optimizing all of the metrics mentioned above. In addition, our framework has flexible choices of models, surrogate losses, and optimization algorithms without the common geometric assumption on unlabeled data such as the cluster assumption or manifold assumption. We provide an estimation error bound to show that our risk estimator is consistent. Finally, we conduct experiments to show the usefulness of our framework.

Learning from triplet comparison data has been extensively studied in the context of metric learning, where we want to learn a distance metric between two instances, and ordinal embedding, where we want to learn an embedding in a Euclidean space of the given instances that preserve the comparison order as much as possible. Unlike fully labeled data, triplet comparison data can be collected in a more accurate and human-friendly way. Although learning from triplet comparison data has been considered in many applications, an important fundamental question of whether we can learn a classifier only from triplet comparison data without all the labels has remained unanswered. In this letter, we give a positive answer to this important question by proposing an unbiased estimator for the classification risk under the empirical risk minimization framework. Since the proposed method is based on the empirical risk minimization framework, it inherently has the advantage that any surrogate loss function and any model, including neural networks, can be easily applied. Furthermore, we theoretically establish an estimation error bound for the proposed empirical risk minimizer. Finally, we provide experimental results to show that our method empirically works well and outperforms various baseline methods.