Age-related cognitive decline varies greatly in healthy older adults, which may partly be explained by differences in the functional architecture of brain networks. Resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) derived network parameters as widely used markers describing this architecture have even been successfully used to support diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases. The current study aimed at examining whether these parameters may also be useful in classifying and predicting cognitive performance differences in the normally aging brain by using machine learning (ML). Classifiability and predictability of global and domain-specific cognitive performance differences from nodal and network-level RSFC strength measures were examined in healthy older adults from the 1000BRAINS study (age range: 55–85 years). ML performance was systematically evaluated across different analytic choices in a robust cross-validation scheme. Across these analyses, classification performance did not exceed 60% accuracy for global and domain-specific cognition. Prediction performance was equally low with high mean absolute errors (MAEs ≥ 0.75) and low to none explained variance (R2 ≤ 0.07) for different cognitive targets, feature sets, and pipeline configurations. Current results highlight limited potential of functional network parameters to serve as sole biomarker for cognitive aging and emphasize that predicting cognition from functional network patterns may be challenging.

In recent years, new insights into brain network communication related to cognitive performance differences in older age have been gained. Simultaneously, an increasing number of studies has turned to machine learning (ML) approaches for the development of biomarkers in health and disease. Given the increasing aging population and the impact cognition has on the quality of life of older adults, automated markers for cognitive aging gain importance. This study addressed the classification and prediction power of resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) strength measures for cognitive performance in healthy older adults using a battery of standard ML approaches. Classifiability and predictability of cognitive abilities was found to be low across analytic choices. Results emphasize limited potential of these metrics as sole biomarker for cognitive aging.

This content is only available as a PDF.

Author notes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

These authors contributed equally.

Handling Editor: Olaf Sporns

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For a full description of the license, please visit

Supplementary data